Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Microarray analysis of gene expression during the cell cycle.

Stephen Cooper1, Kerby Shedden

  • 1Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor Michigan 48109-0620, USA. cooper@umich.edu

Cell & Chromosome
|October 28, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Blended mobile health and wellness coaching enhances student engagement in mental health care.

Academia mental health & well-being·2026
Same author

Brief interactive lifestyle preventive medicine video education in the primary care clinic: Protocol for a randomized clinical trial.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Urinary clusterin as a biomarker of human kidney disease progression and response to the endothelin receptor antagonist atrasentan: An exploratory analysis from the SONAR trial.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Association between placental malaria, postnatal linear growth, and body mass index in the Dogon Longitudinal Study, Mali.

Malaria journal·2026
Same author

ASET: an end-to-end pipeline for quantification and visualization of allele specific expression.

BMC bioinformatics·2025
Same author

Associations of latitude and photoperiod with sleep duration in a yearlong study of US physicians.

Sleep medicine·2025
Same journal

Two mosaic terminal inverted duplications arising post-zygotically: Evidence for possible formation of neo-telomeres.

Cell & chromosome·2008
Same journal

Calyculin A, an enhancer of myosin, speeds up anaphase chromosome movement.

Cell & chromosome·2007
Same journal

Trend towards varying combinatorial centromere association in morphologically identical clusters in Purkinje neurons.

Cell & chromosome·2006
Same journal

Non-obstructive azoospermia and maturation arrest with complex translocation 46,XY t(9;13;14)(p22;q21.2;p13) is consistent with the Luciani-Guo hypothesis of latent aberrant autosomal regions and infertility.

Cell & chromosome·2005
Same journal

Chromosomal changes in uroepithelial carcinomas.

Cell & chromosome·2005
Same journal

Chromosome loops arising from intrachromosomal tethering of telomeres occur at high frequency in G1 (non-cycling) mitotic cells: Implications for telomere capture.

Cell & chromosome·2004
See all related articles

Microarray studies often claim many genes show cell cycle-dependent expression. However, this review questions these findings due to issues with cell synchronization methods and statistical analysis, suggesting skepticism is warranted.

Area of Science:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Genomics
  • Cell Biology

Background:

  • Microarray technology has been widely used to study genome-wide gene expression patterns.
  • Previous studies on yeast, mammalian, and bacterial cells suggested numerous genes exhibit cell-cycle-dependent expression.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically re-evaluate conclusions drawn from microarray analyses of cell-cycle-dependent gene expression.
  • To assess the impact of synchronization methodologies and statistical rigor on these conclusions.

Main Methods:

  • Review and critical analysis of published microarray data concerning cell cycle gene expression.
  • Application of explicit criteria for cell synchronization and identification of cell-cycle-dependent expression patterns.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Identified limitations in synchronization methods, including the use of whole-culture techniques that may not effectively synchronize cells.
  • Noted questionable statistical rigor in identifying cell-cycle-dependent gene expression from microarray data.
  • Highlighted uncertainties in both synchrony methodology and microarray analysis interpretation.

Conclusions:

  • The interpretation of a large number of cell-cycle-dependent genes based on current microarray studies is weakened by methodological concerns.
  • Skepticism is advised regarding claims of widespread cell-cycle-dependent gene expression due to uncertainties in data acquisition and analysis.
  • Further refinement of synchronization and statistical methods is needed for accurate assessment of cell cycle gene regulation.