Related Experiment Videos
What is life? Prerequisites for a definition
1Department of Biology, University of Biology, West Hartford, Connecticut 06117, USA. dix@mail.hartford.edu
The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine
|October 29, 2003
Summary
This paper argues for an unbiased definition of life, free from unsupported assumptions. Such a definition is crucial for scientific and theological dialogue on the nature of existence.
Area of Science:
- Philosophy of Science
- Origin of Life Studies
- Theology
Background:
- Current definitions of life are often biased, with biologists viewing it as transient and theologians as eternal.
- Implicit, unsupported assumptions surround the concept of life, hindering objective understanding.
- The validity of concepts like 'life' requires rigorous examination, akin to scientific principles.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify prerequisites for an unbiased, evidence-based definition of life.
- To challenge implicit assumptions about life's origins, nature, and distinguishability from non-life.
- To propose a framework for a definition that bridges biological and theological perspectives.
Main Methods:
- Critical analysis of existing assumptions about life.
- Identification of unwarranted presuppositions in current biological and theological discourse.
- Conceptual framework development for a new definition of life.
Main Results:
- Numerous implicit assumptions about life lack empirical support.
- The concept of 'life' may be as ill-defined as historical scientific concepts like 'phlogiston'.
- A definition of life must be broad, loosely structured, and free of bias.
Conclusions:
- An unbiased definition of life requires explicit, evidence-based assumptions.
- Such a definition should encompass the evolutionary processes from matter and energy to conscious organisms and truth discovery.
- This approach can foster dialogue between disparate fields like biology and theology.