Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Performance of high-throughput DNA quantification methods.

Kashif A Haque1, Ruth M Pfeiffer, Michael B Beerman

  • 1Core Genotyping Facility, SAIC-Frederick, Inc, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. haquek@mail.nih.gov

BMC Biotechnology
|October 30, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Eating Disorders and Parkinson's Disease-1: Comorbidities, Neurobiology, and Family History.

European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association·2026
Same author

Eating Disorders and Parkinson's Disease - 2: Population Burden, Genetic Epidemiology and Shared Genomics.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Eating Disorders and Parkinson's Disease - 1: Comorbidities, Neurobiology and Family History.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Community health survey development, administration, social determinants and mental health in African immigrants and refugees in Portland Oregon.

BMC public health·2025
Same author

Genome-wide association studies of binge eating behaviour and anorexia nervosa yield insights into the unique and shared biology of eating disorder phenotypes.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2025
Same author

Deep sequencing of candidate genes identified 14 variants associated with smoking abstinence in an ethnically diverse sample.

Scientific reports·2024
Same journal

Editorial Expression of Concern: Hindering the biofilm of microbial pathogens and cancer cell lines development using silver nanoparticles synthesized by epidermal mucus proteins from Clarias gariepinus.

BMC biotechnology·2026
Same journal

Computer-guided enzyme engineering of PET hydrolase mutants towards improved PET affinity.

BMC biotechnology·2026
Same journal

Synthesis and application of exopolysaccharide-selenium nanocomposite produced by Pseudoduganella armeniaca ZMN-3.

BMC biotechnology·2026
Same journal

Read-mapping signatures for molecular characterization of transgenic DNA insertions in paired-end Illumina data.

BMC biotechnology·2026
Same journal

Comparative analysis of MinION and MiSeq using 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing in human gut microbiome.

BMC biotechnology·2026
Same journal

Integrated structure-based and systems-level identification of PDE9A inhibitors for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

BMC biotechnology·2026
See all related articles

Spectrophotometric DNA quantification (OD) showed the highest accuracy and precision among tested methods. While OD is most concordant, quantitative PCR offers valuable insights into DNA sample suitability for specific protocols.

Area of Science:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Genetics
  • Biochemistry

Background:

  • Accurate DNA concentration estimation is crucial for high-throughput genetic analyses.
  • Spectrophotometric (OD), PicoGreen (PG), and quantitative PCR (QG) methods were evaluated for DNA quantification.
  • Sample handling effects on DNA concentration estimates were assessed.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate and compare the performance of spectrophotometric (OD), PicoGreen (PG), and quantitative genomic PCR (QG) DNA quantification methods.
  • To assess the impact of laboratory sample handling on DNA concentration estimates.

Main Methods:

  • DNA samples were diluted to specific concentrations (350 ng/uL to 5 ng/uL).
  • Concentrations were measured using OD, PG, and QG assays.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Variance components analysis was used to assess sample-to-sample variation and sample handling effects.

    • Main Results:

    • The OD method demonstrated the highest concordance with the reference sample.
    • Sample-to-sample variation contributed significantly to total variance (36.0-95.7%).
    • Sample handling variance was minimal (0.8-17.5%), with residual error being a larger factor.

    Conclusions:

    • The choice of DNA quantification method depends on laboratory protocol requirements, accuracy, precision, and throughput.
    • OD quantification is the most concordant and precise method identified in this study.
    • Quantitative PCR offers crucial information on DNA sample suitability for PCR, despite lower concordance and precision.