Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

Meiotic Spindle Assessment in Mouse Oocytes by siRNA-mediated Silencing
Published on: October 11, 2015
Meiotic spindle location and identification and its effect on embryonic cleavage plane and early development
S Cooke1, J P P Tyler, G L Driscoll
1IVFAustralia-Western Sydney, 12 Caroline Street, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia. scooke@ivf.com.au
Background:
To examine the relationship between the meiotic spindle, the first cleavage plane and any resulting influence on embryonic development parameters.
Methods:
Sibling oocytes (n = 246) were allocated to either a control [polar body (PB)-aligned] or a treatment (spindle-aligned) microinjection group by use of a random numbers table. Spindles were identified by PolScope((R)) and the early embryo development parameters, and angle of first cleavage plane in relation to a defined animal-vegetal pole were analysed.
Results:
Most oocytes (92.7%) had a visible spindle at the time of microinjection; however, 62.6% of first PBs (1PBs) were not located above the spindle (average deviation 37.3 +/- 33.2 degrees; range 0-176.6), with 6.9% of 1PBs in the opposite hemisphere to the spindle. The second PBs (2PBs) can also have an unpredictable deviation from the position of the meiotic spindle (12.5 +/- 16.7 degrees; range 0-91.8). This increased when the 1PB was above the spindle, forming a physical barrier to extrusion (average 24.7 +/- 16.1 degrees; range 7.9-91.8). Embryos developing from the spindle-aligned microinjection group had significantly more blastomeres per embryo (P = 0.044), a higher morphology score per embryo (P = 0.008) and a significantly higher average embryo score parameter (P = 0.003), with more embryos developing without any detectable fragmentation (P < 0.05) than the PB-aligned control group. Non-fragmented embryos undergo meridional cleavage, with a small angle between the spindle location and first cleavage plane (16.4 +/- 14.0 degrees ) compared with embryos with some degree of fragmentation (P = 0.002). This angle increased with the degree of fragmentation, with worst quality embryos having a spindle:cleavage angle of 45.1 +/- 17.7 degrees.
Conclusions:
The 1PB and, to a lesser degree, the 2PB can be unreliable predictors of the exact meiotic spindle location in human oocytes. Embryos from spindle-aligned oocytes have an increase in all measured development parameters over control siblings. When the animal pole is defined as the meiotic spindle location, non-fragmented embryos tend to develop from a meridional cleavage; with the most fragmented embryos developing from a more equatorial initial cleavage plane. This study proposes that the spindle accurately marks the animal pole in human oocytes, and provides evidence linking the meiotic spindle location to the first cleavage plane and resulting early embryo development parameters in human embryos.
Related Concept Videos
Meiosis II
Cleavage and Blastulation
The Mitotic Spindle
The bipolar configuration of the mitotic spindle facilitates chromosomal segregation, preparing the cell for division. One mechanism that ensures bipolar mitotic...
Spindle Assembly
In most cells, centrosomes are the primary microtubule nucleation centers. In the centrosome-mediated pathway, the G2-prophase transition triggers centrosome maturation and increased microtubule nucleation. Progressive nucleation results in a microtubule array...
Determining the Plane of Cell Division
Animal cells
In animal cells, the cleavage furrow forms along the plane of cell division starting...
Meiosis II
The timing and cell division patterns of meiosis differ between males and females. In male meiosis, the centrosomes are part of the formation of the meiotic spindle. However, in oocytes, including that of humans, Drosophila,...

