Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 30, 2026

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
Published on: May 3, 2016
Malingering on the RAVLT. Part I. Deterrence strategies
K Sullivan1, B Keane, C Deffenti
1School of Psychology and Counselling, Queensland University of Technology, Carseldine 4034, Queensland, Australia. ka.sullivan@qut.edu.au
Abstract:
The effect of warning regarding detection of malingering on the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) was examined in this study. Sixty undergraduate students were randomly assigned to one of four conditions: malingerers, malingerers-with-warnings, warning-only, and control. An incentive that appeared differential, but was an actual constant reward, was offered to participants who could fake in a believable manner (for those in malingering conditions), or to those who performed to the best of their ability (non-malingering conditions). It was predicted that warning participants about the possibility that faking could be detected would modify the behaviour of malingerers, but not those instructed to perform to the best of their ability. Warning had no effect on behaviour in either condition, which was consistent with expectations for the warning-only group, but not for the malingering group. Results are discussed in terms of the ethical and legal issues associated with malingering in neuropsychological practice.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Impression Management Techniques III: Aligning Actions
Understanding Deception
Impression Management Techniques IV: Altercasting
Punishment
Punishment can be positive or negative. Positive punishment involves adding an undesirable stimulus, such as scolding, to decrease a behavior. Negative punishment involves removing a desirable stimulus, such as taking away a favorite toy, to decrease behavior.
Behavior Modification
A real-world application of operant conditioning principles is applied...
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping

