Related Experiment Videos
Progeny testing and selection intensity for Holstein bulls in different countries
R L Powell1, H D Norman, A H Sanders
1Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD 20705-2350, USA. rpowell@aipl.arsusda.gov
Journal of Dairy Science
|November 5, 2003
Summary
Progeny testing (PT) programs for Holstein bulls vary significantly across countries in terms of bull age, herd size, and graduation rates. Selection intensities differ, particularly for traits like somatic cell score and udder support, indicating diverse breeding goals.
Area of Science:
- Animal Breeding and Genetics
- Dairy Science
- Quantitative Genetics
Background:
- Progeny testing (PT) is crucial for evaluating dairy bulls.
- International Bull Evaluation Service (Interbull) provides standardized evaluations.
- Understanding national PT program characteristics is essential for genetic improvement.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze and compare the characteristics of progeny testing programs for Holstein bulls across ten countries.
- To identify variations in PT program components and selection intensities.
- To highlight potential areas for improvement in international PT strategies.
Main Methods:
- Utilized International Bull Evaluation Service (Interbull) Holstein evaluations from 1995 to 2003.
- Defined bull graduation based on the second Interbull evaluation and daughter numbers.
- Analyzed data on bull age, herd size, daughter numbers, and selection intensities for various traits.
Main Results:
- Significant variation observed in mean bull age at PT decision (12 months range) and number of herds/daughters across countries.
- Countries with higher evaluation requirements generally had more herds/daughters but older bulls at PT decision.
- Graduation percentages ranged from 4.4% to 14.7%, with selection intensities around 1.0 for yield traits but varied for other traits like somatic cell score and udder traits.
Conclusions:
- National breeding goals influence selection intensities, leading to variations in PT program outcomes.
- Differences in PT program components offer insights into potential areas for optimization.
- Comparative analysis of PT programs can guide improvements in dairy cattle genetic evaluation and breeding strategies.