Comparison of dose calculation algorithms with Monte Carlo methods for photon arcs
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 30, 2026

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification (ADCI) and Dose Estimation
Published on: September 4, 2017
James C L Chow1, Eugene Wong, Jeff Z Chen
1Department of Physics, London Regional Cancer Center, 790 Commissioners Road East, London, ON N6A 4L6, Canada. james.chow@grhosp.on.ca
Abstract:
The objective of this study is to seek an accurate and efficient method to calculate the dose distribution of a photon arc. The algorithms tested include Monte Carlo, pencil beam kernel (PK), and collapsed cone convolution (CCC). For the Monte Carlo dose calculation, EGS4/DOSXYZ was used. The SRCXYZ source code associated with the DOSXYZ was modified so that the gantry angle of a photon beam would be sampled uniformly within the arc range about an isocenter to simulate a photon arc. Specifically, photon beams (6/18 MV, 4 x 4 and 10 x 10 cm2) described by a phase space file generated by BEAM (MCPHS), or by two point sources with different photon energy spectra (MCDIV) were used. These methods were used to calculate three-dimensional (3-D) distributions in a PMMA phantom, a cylindrical water phantom, and a phantom with lung inhomogeneity. A commercial treatment planning system was also used to calculate dose distributions in these phantoms using equivalent tissue air ratio (ETAR), PK and CCC algorithms for inhomogeneity corrections. Dose distributions for a photon arc in these phantoms were measured using a RK ion chamber and radiographic films. For homogeneous phantoms, the measured results agreed well (approximately 2% error) with predictions by the Monte Carlo simulations (MCPHS and MCDIV) and the treatment planning system for the 180 degrees and 360 degrees photon arcs. For the dose distribution in the phantom with lung inhomogeneity with a 90 degrees photon arc, the Monte Carlo calculations agreed with the measurements within 2%, while the treatment planning system using ETAR, PK and CCC underestimated or overestimated the dose inside the lung inhomogeneity from 6% to 12%.
More Related Videos
06:20Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition
Published on: March 11, 2021
07:31Characterization of Recombination Effects in a Liquid Ionization Chamber Used for the Dosimetry of a Radiosurgical Accelerator
Published on: May 9, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Biological Effects of Radiation
Area Computation by the Alternative Coordinate Method
Fundamental Mathematical Principles in Pharmacokinetics: Calculus and Graphs
On the other hand, integral calculus focuses on...
Determination of Multiple Dosing Parameters: Steady-State, Minimum and Maximum Concentrations
Model-Independent Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Noncompartmental Analysis
One important characteristic of noncompartmental analyses is that drug exposure increases proportionally with increasing doses. This relationship...