Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 11, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Using claims data to examine mortality trends following hospitalization for heart attack in Medicare
Arlene S Ash1, Michael A Posner, Jeanne Speckman
1Health Care Research Unit, Boston University School of Medicine, MA 02118, USA.
Insights
Medicare patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) did not experience worsening one-year mortality. Advanced models using comprehensive morbidity data suggest outcomes have plateaued, not declined, highlighting the value of claims data for performance evaluation.
Area of Science:
- Health Services Research
- Biostatistics
- Cardiovascular Medicine
Background:
- A rise in one-year mortality for Medicare patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) was observed between 1995 and 1999.
- Changes in patient demographics and illness burden may explain this trend.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine if shifts in Medicare patient demographics and comorbidity burden account for the observed increase in one-year post-AMI mortality from 1995-1999.
- To evaluate the accuracy of different risk adjustment models in predicting mortality.
Main Methods:
- Utilized Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) fee-for-service claims and vital status data for over 1.5 million AMI discharges (1995-1999).
- Developed logistic regression models (CORE, Charlson, DCG, CCS) to predict one-year mortality using demographic and comorbidity data.
- Applied models to calculate risk-adjusted mortality and assessed predictive accuracy (C-statistics).
Main Results:
- Comprehensive comorbidity classifications (DCG, CCS) demonstrated superior predictive accuracy (C-statistics: 0.82, 0.81) compared to the CORE model (0.74) and Charlson (0.66).
- Risk adjustment using the CORE model partially reduced the apparent mortality increase.
- Adjustment with morbidity models (DCG, CCS) resulted in stable, flat mortality trends, negating the observed increase.
Conclusions:
- Claims data contain rich morbidity information crucial for accurate risk adjustment and performance evaluation.
- The observed rise in one-year AMI mortality may be an artifact of using less comprehensive risk adjustment methods.
- Medicare patient outcomes post-AMI may have plateaued rather than worsened, underscoring the need for robust data and analytical approaches.
Objective:
To see if changes in the demographics and illness burden of Medicare patients hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) from 1995 through 1999 can explain an observed rise (from 32 percent to 34 percent) in one-year mortality over that period.
Data Sources:
Utilization data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) fee-for-service claims (MedPAR, Outpatient, and Carrier Standard Analytic Files); patient demographics and date of death from CMS Denominator and Vital Status files. For over 1.5 million AMI discharges in 1995-1999 we retain diagnoses from one year prior, and during, the case-defining admission.
Study Design:
We fit logistic regression models to predict one-year mortality for the 1995 cases and apply them to 1996-1999 files. The CORE model uses age, sex, and original reason for Medicare entitlement to predict mortality. Three other models use the CORE variables plus morbidity indicators from well-known morbidity classification methods (Charlson, DCG, and AHRQ's CCS). Regressions were used as is--without pruning to eliminate clinical or statistical anomalies. Each model references the same diagnoses--those recorded during the pre- and index admission periods. We compare each model's ability to predict mortality and use each to calculate risk-adjusted mortality in 1996-1999.
Principal Findings:
The comprehensive morbidity classifications (DCG and CCS) led to more accurate predictions than the Charlson, which dominated the CORE model (validated C-statistics: 0.81, 0.82, 0.74, and 0.66, respectively). Using the CORE model for risk adjustment reduced, but did not eliminate, the mortality increase. In contrast, adjustment using any of the morbidity models produced essentially flat graphs.
Conclusions:
Prediction models based on claims-derived demographics and morbidity profiles can be extremely accurate. While one-year post-AMI mortality in Medicare may not be worsening, outcomes appear not to have continued to improve as they had in the prior decade. Rich morbidity information is available in claims data, especially when longitudinally tracked across multiple settings of care, and is important in setting performance targets and evaluating trends.
Related Concept Videos
Pulse rhythm
Conversely, an irregular pulse pattern is termed dysrhythmia, stemming from disruptions in cardiac muscle...
Actuarial Approach
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
Kaplan-Meier Approach
Assumptions of Survival Analysis
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
