Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Repeated-measures contrasts for "multiple-pattern" hypotheses.

R Michael Furr1, Robert Rosenthal

  • 1Department of Psychology, Appalachian State University, Boone, North Carolina 28608, USA. furrrm@appstate.edu

Psychological Methods
|November 5, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A largely univariate framework for understanding multivariate analysis of variance.

Psychological methods·2026
Same author

Patience and Patience Regulation: Development and Psychometric Evaluation of Complementary Scales with Alternate Forms.

Journal of personality assessment·2026
Same author

Assessing the Response Process Validity of the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory Using Cognitive Interviews.

Journal of personality assessment·2026
Same author

Using Generative Artificial Intelligence to Advance Hypothesis-Driven Scale Validation: Identifying Criterion Measures and Generating Precise a Priori Hypotheses.

Assessment·2025
Same author

Is Doing Good Good Enough? A Motivation, Action, Sacrifice, and Temptation (MAST) View of Moral Praiseworthiness.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2024
Same author

Truthfulness Predominates in Americans' Conceptualizations of Honesty: A Prototype Analysis.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2023
Same journal

Bayesian evaluation for latent variable models: A tutorial on computing information criteria and bayes factors with the r package bleval.

Psychological methods·2026
Same journal

A stochastic block prior for clustering in graphical models.

Psychological methods·2026
Same journal

Three-level vector autoregressive models.

Psychological methods·2026
Same journal

Scaling cognitive modeling to big data: A deep learning approach to studying individual differences in evidence accumulation model parameters.

Psychological methods·2026
Same journal

Best practices in multilevel modeling for within-cluster group comparisons: An evaluation of coding strategies reflecting group composition and heterogeneity.

Psychological methods·2026
Same journal

A unified framework for psychometrics in experimental psychology: The standardized generalized hierarchical factor model.

Psychological methods·2026
See all related articles

This study introduces a new framework for analyzing repeated-measures data, allowing researchers to test hypotheses about one or multiple patterns of results across one or more groups.

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Psychology
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Traditional contrast analysis for repeated-measures data often assumes only one pattern of results is relevant.
  • This limits the scope of inquiry for complex research questions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a flexible framework for contrast analysis in repeated-measures designs.
  • To accommodate hypotheses concerning single or multiple patterns of results.
  • To support analyses involving one or multiple participant groups.

Main Methods:

  • Extends existing contrast analysis logic and computational procedures.
  • Integrates the analysis of single-pattern and multiple-pattern hypotheses.
  • Applies to both single-group and multiple-group repeated-measures data.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The proposed framework allows for the simultaneous testing of various hypothesized patterns.
  • Researchers can investigate nuanced questions, such as immediate versus delayed effects.
  • The methodology is applicable across diverse research scenarios with repeated measures.

Conclusions:

  • The developed framework enhances the analytical capabilities for repeated-measures data.
  • It provides a unified approach for examining single and multiple patterns of results.
  • This facilitates more comprehensive and sophisticated hypothesis testing in scientific research.