Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 30, 2026

Functional Site-Directed Fluorometry in Native Cells to Study Skeletal Muscle Excitability
Published on: June 2, 2023
Interactions between charged amino acid residues within transmembrane helices in the sulfate transporter SHST1
Megan C Shelden1, Patrick Loughlin, M Louise Tierney
1School of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Science, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia.
Abstract:
The aim of this study was to identify charged amino acid residues important for activity of the sulfate transporter SHST1. We mutated 10 charged amino acids in or near proposed transmembrane helices and expressed the resulting mutants in a sulfate transport-deficient yeast strain. Mutations affecting four residues resulted in a complete loss of sulfate transport; these residues were D107 and D122 in helix 1 and R354 and E366 in helix 8. All other mutants showed some reduction in transport activity. The E366Q mutant was unusual in that expression of the mutant protein was toxic to yeast cells. The R354Q mutant showed reduced trafficking to the plasma membrane, indicating that the protein was misfolded. However, transporter function (to a low level) and wild-type trafficking could be recovered by combining the R354Q mutation with either the E175Q or E270Q mutations. This suggested that R354 interacts with both E175 and E270. The triple mutant E175Q/E270Q/R354Q retained only marginal sulfate transport activity but was trafficked at wild-type levels, suggesting that a charge network between these three residues may be involved in the transport pathway, rather than in folding. D107 was also found to be essential for the ion transport pathway and may form a charge pair with R154, both of which are highly conserved. The information obtained on interactions between charged residues provides the first evidence for the possible spatial arrangement of transmembrane helices within any member of this transporter family. This information is used to develop a model for SHST1 tertiary structure.
More Related Videos
09:12Selection of Transporter-Targeted Inhibitory Nanobodies by Solid-Supported-Membrane (SSM)-Based Electrophysiology
Published on: May 3, 2021
09:49Sedimentation Equilibrium of a Small Oligomer-forming Membrane Protein: Effect of Histidine Protonation on Pentameric Stability
Published on: April 2, 2015
Related Concept Videos
The Significance of Membrane Transport
Transporters facilitate either an active or passive movement of solutes. They can allow a single-molecule transport down its...
Translocation of Proteins into the Mitochondria
Sorting of outer membrane proteins:
Mitochondrial outer membrane proteins are of two types: the transmembrane, beta-barrel porins, and the membrane-anchored, alpha-helical proteins. Beta-barrel porin precursors are translocated by the TOM complex and inserted into the outer mitochondrial membrane by the SAM complex. In contrast,...
Energy to Drive Translocation
Generally, polypeptides are unfolded by two distinct...
Protein Transport into the Inner Mitochondrial Membrane
Transport of mitochondrial precursors across the TIM23 channel is driven by...
Multi-pass Transmembrane Proteins and β-barrels
α-Helix containing multi-pass transmembrane proteins
Multi-pass transmembrane proteins such as G-protein-linked receptors (GPCRs) and...
Cotranslational Protein Translocation
Sec61 channel partners for cotranslational translocation
During cotranslational translocation, the Sec61 channel partners with the signal recognition particle (SRP), the signal recognition particle receptor (SR), and the ribosomes to transport the nascent polypeptide chain...