Related Experiment Videos
Dietary intake estimated using different methods in two Italian older populations
Benedetta Bartali1, Aida Turrini, Simonetta Salvini
1Geriatric Department, Laboratory of Clinical Epidemiology, National Institute of Research and Care on Aging (INRCA), Viale Michelangiolo no. 41, 50125 Florence, Italy.
Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics
|November 6, 2003
Summary
The European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and nutrition (EPIC) questionnaire effectively assesses nutritional intake in older adults. This food frequency questionnaire provides similar dietary estimates to objective methods at a population level.
Area of Science:
- Gerontology
- Nutritional Epidemiology
- Public Health
Background:
- Nutritional assessment tools for epidemiological studies are often validated in younger populations.
- The reliability of these tools in older adults remains uncertain, necessitating specific validation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To validate the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and nutrition (EPIC) questionnaire for assessing dietary intake in older adults.
- To compare dietary intake data from the EPIC questionnaire with a 7-day diary method in the InCHIANTI study population.
Main Methods:
- The study compared dietary intake data from the EPIC questionnaire (InCHIANTI study) with a 7-day diary (INN-CA study).
- Participants included older men and women randomly sampled from the general population.
- Data analysis focused on macro- and micro-nutrient distributions across different age groups and genders.
Main Results:
- Despite differing populations and data collection methods, macro- and micro-nutrient intake distributions were similar between the EPIC questionnaire and the 7-day diary.
- The food frequency questionnaire demonstrated comparable population-level dietary intake estimates to a more resource-intensive objective method.
Conclusions:
- The EPIC questionnaire shows promise for assessing nutritional intake in older populations within epidemiological research.
- Further research is recommended to validate these findings at an individual level.