Related Experiment Videos
Management of diagnostic uncertainty in children with possible meningitis: a qualitative study
Cathy A Brennan1, Maggie Somerset, Stephen K Granier
1Department of Pathology and Microbiology/Division of Primary Health Care, University of Bristol.
Background:
Neisseria meningitidis serogroup B is the most common cause of bacterial meningitis in children and young adults. Early recognition and prompt intervention with antibiotics are thought to be key to preventing serious complications.
Aim:
Explore how general practitioners evaluate and manage febrile children with possible meningitis or meningococcal septicaemia.
Design Of The Study:
Qualitative study using one-to-one, semi-structured interviews.
Setting:
General practices in the Avon Health Authority district.
Method:
Twenty-six general practitioners were purposefully sampled, using a sampling frame to ensure a range of experience and practices in a variety of settings Data management and analysis were conducted using a grounded theory approach.
Results:
Key themes to emerge were the effect that fear of meningitis has upon parents and general practitioners; the difficulties associated with reaching a diagnosis; and the existence of barriers to the use of guidelines and pre-hospital penicillin. When assessing a febrile child, participating general practitioners rarely thought that meningitis or meningococcal septicaemia were likely, but were aware that this was frequently the principal parental concern. They relied upon intuitive rather than systematic methods to distinguish serious from self-limiting conditions, rarely making a definitive diagnosis. Although concerned about 'missed cases', interviewees doubted that current management could be improved. They questioned the assumption that guidelines could be sufficiently discriminating to be helpful and thought it unlikely that they would be followed in everyday clinical practice. Pre-hospital penicillin was only given if the diagnosis of meningitis or septicaemia was thought to be certain.
Conclusions:
There is a substantial gap in perception between primary and secondary care in the diagnostic and management approach to children who may have meningitis or meningococcal septicaemia. Until this is addressed, further attempts to improve early intervention in primary care are unlikely to succeed.
Insights
General practitioners rarely suspect meningitis in febrile children, despite parental concerns. Gaps in perception and management hinder early intervention for bacterial meningitis and meningococcal septicaemia.
Area of Science:
- Pediatrics
- Infectious Diseases
- General Practice
Background:
- Neisseria meningitidis serogroup B is a leading cause of bacterial meningitis in children and young adults.
- Prompt antibiotic intervention is crucial for preventing severe complications of meningitis.
- Early recognition of meningitis and meningococcal septicaemia is vital.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how general practitioners (GPs) evaluate and manage febrile children with suspected meningitis or meningococcal septicaemia.
- To understand the diagnostic and management approaches in primary care settings.
Main Methods:
- A qualitative study employing semi-structured, one-to-one interviews.
- Purposeful sampling of 26 general practitioners from diverse practices within the Avon Health Authority district.
- Grounded theory approach for data management and analysis.
Main Results:
- GPs rarely considered meningitis or meningococcal septicaemia likely in febrile children, despite it being a common parental fear.
- Diagnostic methods were often intuitive rather than systematic, leading to uncertainty in distinguishing serious from self-limiting conditions.
- Barriers exist to guideline implementation and pre-hospital penicillin use; GPs doubted the utility of guidelines in routine practice.
Conclusions:
- A significant discrepancy exists between primary and secondary care regarding the diagnosis and management of potential meningitis cases.
- Addressing this perceptual and practical gap is essential for improving early intervention strategies in primary care.
- Current approaches to early intervention in primary care are unlikely to succeed without addressing these fundamental issues.
Related Concept Videos
01:18Viral Meningitis
01:22Bacterial Meningitis I: Introduction