Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A new method for choosing sample size for confidence interval-based inferences.

Michael R Jiroutek1, Keith E Muller, Lawrence L Kupper

  • 1Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceutical Research Institute, 5 Research Parkway, Wallingford, Connecticut 06492-7660, USA. michael.jiroutek@bms.com

Biometrics
|November 7, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Short-term outcomes associated with surfactant use in respiratory distress in late preterm to early term infants.

Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association·2026
Same author

Paramedic-Delivered Prehospital Thrombolysis Reduces the Time to Reperfusion Therapy in Patients Suffering ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Rural and Regional NSW.

Heart, lung & circulation·2025
Same author

Health Education Disparities in Patients Diagnosed With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Using Data From the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey for the Years 2012 to 2019.

The science of diabetes self-management and care·2025
Same author

Comparison of Variable Thiamine Dosing Strategies in Critically Ill Patients with Septic Shock.

Shock (Augusta, Ga.)·2025
Same author

An analysis of disparities in imaging for suspected traumatic brain injury among patient visits to emergency departments (2010-2021).

Frontiers in neurology·2025
Same author

Power and sample size for reversible linear mixed models with clustering and longitudinality: GLIMMPSE Version 3.

PloS one·2025
Same journal

Interim analysis in sequential multiple assignment randomized trials for survival outcomes.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Acknowledgment of Referees 2025.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Fast penalized generalized estimating equations for large longitudinal functional datasets.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Causally-interpretable random-effects meta-analysis.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Statistical inference for mean function of partially observed functional time series.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Subgroup identification via Interaction Tree and Mixed Model for Repeated Measures with application to Alzheimer's disease.

Biometrics·2026
See all related articles

Choosing a sample size for scientific studies requires balancing statistical power, confidence interval width, and hypothesis rejection. This research emphasizes simultaneously considering these factors for efficient and ethical study design.

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Biostatistics
  • Research Methodology

Background:

  • Traditional sample size calculations focus on statistical power or confidence interval width, potentially leading to inefficient or ethically concerning study designs.
  • Existing methods may not adequately address scientists' implicit goals of achieving a narrow confidence interval, ensuring parameter validity, and enabling hypothesis rejection simultaneously.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address the limitations of traditional sample size determination methods.
  • To develop a unified approach for sample size selection that considers the simultaneous occurrence of confidence interval width, validity, and rejection events.

Main Methods:

  • Focuses on scalar parameters within a general linear model framework with Gaussian errors.
  • Defines and analyzes three key events: interval width, parameter validity, and null value rejection.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Derives new theoretical results and computational forms for sample size determination.

    • Main Results:

    • Neglecting interval width or rejection in sample size calculations often results in a low probability of achieving all three desired events concurrently.
    • The study highlights the importance of simultaneously evaluating width, validity, and rejection for optimal sample size selection.
    • New theoretical results and practical computational methods are provided for general linear models.

    Conclusions:

    • Scientists should consider width, validity, and rejection simultaneously when determining sample size to ensure study efficiency and goal achievement.
    • The proposed unified approach offers a more comprehensive strategy for sample size planning in statistical hypothesis testing and confidence interval construction.
    • The findings are applicable to scalar parameters in general linear models, with provided computational tools for practical implementation.