Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 17, 2026

Simultaneous Laryngopharyngeal and Conventional Esophageal pH Monitoring
Published on: December 14, 2020
Multipoint measurement of intragastric pH in healthy preterm infants
1Centre for Paediatric and Adolescent Gastroenterology, Women's and Children's Hospital and Department of Paediatrics, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia. taher.omari@adelaide.edu.au
Insights
Feeding has a smaller effect on gastric acidity and reflux in infants than previously thought. Multipoint pH monitoring reveals proximal stomach buffering is less significant, impacting diagnostic accuracy for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Gastroenterology
- Gastrointestinal Physiology
- Neonatal Medicine
Background:
- The diagnostic utility of 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring in infants is debated due to potential feed buffering of gastric acidity.
- Accurate assessment of gastro-oesophageal reflux in neonates is crucial for timely diagnosis and management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To reassess the influence of feeding on gastric pH and reflux events in infants.
- To investigate the impact of feeding on gastric acid profiles using multipoint pH measurements.
Main Methods:
- Simultaneous measurement of esophageal and intragastric pH at multiple levels (3, 6, 9 cm below LES) in 15 healthy premature infants.
- A four-channel pH probe was used for four hours post-feeding to analyze pH parameters and reflux episodes.
- Comparison of intragastric pH at different stomach levels and correlation with esophageal pH during reflux.
Main Results:
- The proximal stomach exhibited significantly more buffering postprandially, taking longer to re-acidify compared to mid and distal stomach segments.
- During gastro-oesophageal reflux episodes, esophageal nadir pH was lower than proximal gastric pH but consistently equal to or higher than distal gastric pH.
- These findings suggest that feed buffering effects on gastric acidity may have been overestimated in prior studies.
Conclusions:
- Multipoint pH monitoring provides a more nuanced understanding of gastric acid dynamics and reflux in infants.
- The study challenges previous assumptions about the extent of feed buffering, potentially refining diagnostic criteria for infant reflux.
- Revised interpretations of esophageal pH monitoring data may be warranted, considering regional gastric pH variations.
Background:
The diagnostic use of 24 hour oesophageal pH monitoring in infants is controversial because of the impact of feed buffering of gastric acidity.
Aim:
To re-evaluate the effect of feeding on gastric pH and reflux using multipoint pH measurements.
Subjects:
Fifteen healthy premature infants fed every four hours.
Methods:
Oesophageal pH and intragastric pH at 3, 6, and 9 cm below the lower oesophageal sphincter were simultaneously measured using a four channel pH probe for four hours after bolus feeding. Parameters of pH were compared for the different levels within the stomach. During reflux episodes, the nadir pH was compared with intragastric pH at all levels.
Results:
The proximal stomach was more significantly buffered by feeding and slower to re-acidify postprandially than the mid and distal stomach (42.2% of the time at pH < 4 compared with 58.7% and 55.7% respectively). During 27 of 62 gastro-oesophageal reflux episodes, nadir oesophageal pH was lower than the pH of the proximal stomach but always equal to or higher than the pH of the distal stomach.
Conclusions:
These data indicate that previous studies may have overestimated the effect of feeding on gastric acidity and reflux.
Related Concept Videos
Stomach pH Regulation
The acid-secreting gastric mucosal epithelial cells (parietal cells) lining the stomach lumen maintain the low pH in the lumen. Numerous ion transporters and channels on these parietal...
Temperature Measurement Sites
Oral: When assessing oral temperature, the thermometer tip should be placed under the tongue in the posterior sublingual pocket. It offers accurate readings and can be...
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.

