Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Comparison of implicit and explicit learning processes in a probabilistic task.

Thomas D Green¹, John H Flowers

¹Department of Psychology, Elon University, NC 27244, USA. greent@elon.edu

Perceptual and Motor Skills

|November 8, 2003

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

AcTor, a novel mTOR stimulator, potentiates ixazomib for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia.

Molecular cancer·2026

Same author

Molecular mechanism leading to human coronary atherosclerosis assessed by proteomic analysis and RNA sequences.

European heart journal·2026

Same author

Deletion of Murine Endothelial Bag3 Alters the Cellular Proteome Among Organs of Origin.

Journal of vascular research·2026

Same author

AcTor, a novel mTOR stimulator, potentiates ixazomib for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia.

Research square·2026

Same author

Chemical-induced colitis lowers mitochondrial bioenergetic function in the colonic epithelium with minimal impacts on the proteome.

Research square·2025

Same author

Deletion of Murine Endothelial <i>Bag3</i> Alters the Cellular Proteome Among Organs of Origin.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025

Same journal

Theoretical and Psychological Mechanisms of Perceptual-Motor Learning in AI Bots-Assisted Art Education.

Perceptual and motor skills·2026

Same journal

Development and Measurement Properties of a Custom-Built Punch Force Dynamometer Based on S-Type Load Cells.

Perceptual and motor skills·2026

Same journal

Do Elite Taekwondo Athletes Invest Time for Better Choices? Analysis of Anticipatory Behavior Through a Perception-Action Coupling Task.

Perceptual and motor skills·2026

Same journal

Multisensory Contributions in Joint Actions: A Scoping Review.

Perceptual and motor skills·2026

Same journal

Proprioceptive Impairment and Joint Position Exposure Time in Relation to Patient-Report Outcome With Chronic Ankle Instability.

Perceptual and motor skills·2026

Same journal

Static Tactical Diagrams and Imagination: Differential Effects on Novice and Expert Handball Players.

Perceptual and motor skills·2026

See all related articles

Explicit learning, whether discovering or applying rules, hindered performance on a fine motor control task. Implicit learning without explicit rules led to superior results, especially early on.

Area of Science:

Cognitive Psychology
Motor Learning
Human-Computer Interaction

Background:

Explicit learning involves conscious rule use, while implicit learning occurs without awareness.
Motor control tasks often benefit from practice, but the role of explicit versus implicit learning strategies is complex.
Probabilistic tasks require adapting to uncertain outcomes, posing challenges for rule-based systems.

Purpose of the Study:

To compare the efficacy of explicit (rule-application, rule-discovery) and implicit (nonrule-instructed) learning on a probabilistic fine motor control task.
To investigate the performance costs associated with attempting to discover or apply explicit rules in a dynamic environment.
To determine which learning approach optimizes performance in early versus later stages of skill acquisition.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

Participants engaged in a probabilistic video game task involving visual tracking and joystick manipulation.
Three learning conditions were implemented: rule-application, rule-discovery, and implicit learning.
Performance metrics, including accuracy and efficiency, were tracked across practice sessions.

Main Results:

All participants demonstrated improvement with practice and utilized predictive relationships.
Implicit learning conditions significantly outperformed explicit rule-application and rule-discovery conditions, particularly in initial learning phases.
Explicit rule use, whether discovered or applied, led to performance decrements.

Conclusions:

Attempting to consciously discover or apply rules incurs significant cognitive costs, impairing performance.
Implicit learning is more effective for optimizing performance in probabilistic fine motor control tasks, especially during early acquisition.
Cognitive load associated with explicit rule management likely underlies performance deficits.