Related Experiment Videos
The removal of the smear layer using EGTA: a scanning electron microscopic study
Deepak Viswanath1, Amitha M Hegde, A K Munshi
1Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Children Dentistry, ABSMIDS, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.
The Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry
|November 8, 2003
Summary
Ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid (EDTA) and ethylene glycol bis (beta-amino ethyl ether)-N, N, N
Area of Science:
- Endodontic Dentistry
- Dental Materials Science
- Scanning Electron Microscopy
Background:
- The smear layer, a residue from endodontic instrumentation, occludes dentinal tubules and covers prepared canal walls.
- Effective smear layer removal is crucial for successful endodontic treatment and sealing.
- Current chelating agents like EDTA are widely used but may have drawbacks.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of ethylene glycol bis (beta-amino ethyl ether)-N, N, N', N'-tetra acetic acid (EGTA) and ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid (EDTA) in removing the endodontic smear layer.
- To evaluate the effects of these chelators on dentinal tubules using scanning electron microscopy (SEM).
Main Methods:
- Twenty-four single-rooted teeth were selected for the study.
- Teeth were instrumented and irrigated with different solutions, including EGTA and EDTA.
- Specimens were analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to assess smear layer removal and tubule integrity.
Main Results:
- Both EGTA and EDTA effectively removed the smear layer from the prepared root canals.
- EDTA treatment resulted in erosion and conjugation of dentinal tubules.
- EGTA demonstrated effective smear layer removal without causing significant erosion or conjugation of tubules.
Conclusions:
- EGTA is a viable alternative chelator for endodontic smear layer removal.
- EGTA offers an advantage over EDTA by preserving the integrity of dentinal tubules.
- This finding supports the use of EGTA in endodontic procedures to enhance treatment outcomes.