Placement of mineral trioxide aggregate using two different techniques

The purpose of this study was to determine if the adaptation of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) would differ when placed into simulated root canals of varying length when using two different placement and condensation methods. Hand condensation was compared to ultrasonic condensation. Eighty polyethylene tubes were divided into four groups of 20 tubes each. The tubes in the four groups were prepared to receive 3-, 5-, 7-, and 10-mm lengths of MTA respectively. Each group of 20 tubes was subdivided; 10 samples of each length had MTA placed and condensed by the hand method and the other 10 by the ultrasonic method. After condensation the samples were evaluated with a light microscope and radiographs for the degree of adaptation of the MTA to the tube walls and for the presence of voids within the MTA material itself. The results demonstrated an 80% agreement for findings between the light microscopy and radiographic evaluation. Hand condensation resulted in better adaptation to the tube walls and less voids than the ultrasonic method. There was no significant difference in the results for any of the four lengths of MTA placed by the hand method (p > 0.9). At this time hand condensation should be considered the preferred method for placement of MTA.