Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Biosafety concerns for shared flow cytometry core facilities.

Ingrid Schmid1, Steven Merlin, Stephen P Perfetto

  • 1David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Department of Hematology/Oncology, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA. schmid@mednet.ucla.edu

Cytometry. Part a : the Journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology
|November 11, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A scalable software framework for data integration in bioprocess development.

Engineering in life sciences·2020
Same author

Procedures for Flow Cytometry-Based Sorting of Unfixed Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Infected Cells and Other Infectious Agents.

Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology·2020
Same author

High-fidelity detection and sorting of nanoscale vesicles in viral disease and cancer.

Journal of extracellular vesicles·2019
Same author

Novel Impactor and Microsphere-Based Assay Used to Measure Containment of Aerosols Generated in a Flow Cytometer Cell Sorter.

Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology·2018
Same author

Assessment of susceptible chemical modification sites of trastuzumab and endogenous human immunoglobulins at physiological conditions.

Communications biology·2018
Same author

Methodology for evaluating and comparing flow cytometers: A multisite study of 23 instruments.

Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology·2018
Same journal

The 1st Mediterranean Meeting on Flow Cytometry: Forging New Collaborations Across the Mediterranean and Beyond.

Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology·2026
Same journal

Publication Guidelines for Optimized Multiparameter Immunolabeling Panels (OMIPs).

Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology·2026
Same journal

A Modular High-Parameter Flow Cytometry Framework: Pre-Analytical Optimization and Validation for Clinical Research.

Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology·2026
Same journal

Quantitative Detection of Entotic Cell-In-Cell Structures Using Deformable Segmentation and Deep Learning.

Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology·2026
Same journal

Comparison of Tissue Preparations to Identify and Phenotype T Cells in Human Colorectal Tumor Tissue.

Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology·2026
Same journal

Refractive Index-Correlated Pseudocoloring for Adaptive Color Fusion in Holotomographic Cytology.

Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology·2026
See all related articles

Shared flow cytometry facilities offer economic access to analytical cytometers. A biosafety questionnaire framework is crucial for transmitting experimental sample hazard information to protect personnel and users.

Area of Science:

  • Analytical Cytology
  • Biosafety in Research Facilities

Background:

  • Shared flow cytometry facilities provide cost-effective access to advanced instrumentation for researchers lacking individual funding or sufficient sample volume.
  • The diverse nature of samples processed in core facilities presents varying biohazard potentials, necessitating robust safety protocols.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review critical safety issues pertinent to flow cytometry core facilities.
  • To discuss the components of a biosafety questionnaire framework for shared facilities.

Main Methods:

  • Review of safety issues in flow cytometry core facilities.
  • Discussion of a framework biosafety questionnaire developed by the International Society for Analytical Cytology's Biosafety Committee.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Identification of critical safety concerns in shared flow cytometry operations.
  • Analysis of a biosafety questionnaire designed to gather essential hazard information from investigators.

Conclusions:

  • Effective communication of sample biohazard potential is vital for ensuring the safety of personnel and users in flow cytometry core facilities.
  • A standardized biosafety questionnaire is essential for managing risks associated with diverse experimental samples.