Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Classifying failed hip arthroplasty: generalizability of reliability and validity.

Aileen M Davis1, Emil H Schemitsch, Jeffrey D Gollish

  • 1Research, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Room 1119, 550 University Avenue, Toronto, Canada MSG 2A2. davis.aileen@torontorehab.on.ca

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
|November 13, 2003
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Trochanteric Osteotomy in Two-Stage Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2026
Same author

Treatment of Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome Using a Pelvic Tilt-Focused Exercise Program: A Prospective Cohort.

The American journal of sports medicine·2026
Same author

Retrospective Review of Outcomes of Conversion Total Hip Arthroplasty Following Failed Internal Fixation at Mean 3.1-Year Follow-Up.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2026
Same author

Periprosthetic Fractures of the Acetabulum: A Rare, but Serious Complication of Total Hip Arthroplasty.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2026
Same author

Trajectories of disability and influence of contextual factors among adults aging with HIV: Insights from a community-based longitudinal study in Toronto, Canada.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Reassessing the minimal clinically important differences of patient-reported outcomes in cervical myelopathy: a patient-centered approach from the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network.

Journal of neurosurgery. Spine·2025

Radiographic assessment for revision hip arthroplasty shows moderate interrater reliability. A standardized classification system is needed for better patient stratification and surgical planning in complex hip revision cases.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopaedic Surgery
  • Radiology
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • Revision hip arthroplasty involves complex bone loss assessment.
  • Accurate radiographic evaluation is crucial for surgical planning and patient stratification.
  • Existing severity classification systems require validation for generalizability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the interrater reliability and validity of a radiographic severity classification system.
  • To assess the agreement between radiographic findings and intraoperative observations in revision hip arthroplasty.
  • To determine the generalizability of the classification system across different raters and institutions.

Main Methods:

  • A cohort of 81 patients undergoing revision hip arthroplasty was studied.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Preoperative anteroposterior radiographs were rated by three academic orthopaedic surgeons using a five-level bone stock loss scale.
  • Radiographic ratings were compared with intraoperative findings for validity assessment.

    • Main Results:

    • Interrater reliability was moderate (weighted kappa 0.54 acetabular, 0.56 femoral).
    • Agreement between radiographic and intraoperative findings was also moderate (weighted kappa 0.41 acetabular, 0.39 femoral).
    • Significant discrepancies were noted, with intraoperative findings often differing from radiographic assessments.

    Conclusions:

    • The evaluated radiographic severity classification demonstrates moderate reliability and validity in revision hip arthroplasty.
    • The system's generalizability may be limited, necessitating further training or refinement.
    • A reliable and valid classification is essential for improving patient stratification and preoperative planning in revision hip surgery.