Related Experiment Videos
Cost and utilization comparisons among propensity score-matched insulin lispro and regular insulin users
Jennifer A Hall1, Kent H Summers, Robert L Obenchain
1Economic and Outcomes Division, Ingenix, Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344, USA. jennifer.hall@ingenix.com
Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy : JMCP
|November 14, 2003
Summary
Insulin lispro users had more outpatient visits and pharmacy costs but fewer hospitalizations compared to regular insulin users. Overall direct health care costs were similar between the two insulin types in the short term.
Area of Science:
- Pharmacoeconomics
- Health Services Research
- Endocrinology
Background:
- Insulin lispro is a rapid-acting insulin analog, while regular insulin is a short-acting human insulin.
- Understanding the cost and utilization differences between these insulins is crucial for healthcare management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the healthcare costs and utilization patterns of patients using insulin lispro versus regular insulin.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of administrative claims data from 1998-1999.
- 1:1 propensity score matching to control for baseline differences between user groups.
- Analysis of 12-month pharmacy and medical costs and utilization (office visits, hospitalizations).
Main Results:
- Matched cohort included 1,832 pairs of insulin lispro and regular insulin users.
- Insulin lispro users had more office visits and pharmacy prescriptions but fewer inpatient hospital visits.
- Higher average office visit and pharmacy costs but lower inpatient hospital costs were observed for insulin lispro users.
Conclusions:
- Total direct healthcare costs were not significantly different between insulin lispro and regular insulin users in the short term.
- Insulin lispro use was associated with higher drug product and ambulatory care costs, offset by lower inpatient costs.