Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 30, 2026

Trabecular Meshwork Response to Pressure Elevation in the Living Human Eye
Published on: June 20, 2015
Endothelia of Schlemm's canal and trabecular meshwork: distinct molecular, functional, and anatomic features
Jorge A Alvarado1, Abigail Betanzos, Linda Franse-Carman
1Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143-0730, USA. jalva@itsa.ucsf.edu
The purpose of this study was to compare human endothelial cells from Schlemm's canal (SCEs) and the trabecular meshwork (TMEs) in terms of ZO-1 isoform expression, hydraulic conductivity (HC) properties, and "giant" vacuole (GV) formation. The principal study methods were Western blot, RT-PCR, immunofluorescence, and perfusion chambers. Blot signals for alpha+ - and alpha- -isoforms were similar in SCEs but less intense for the alpha+ -relative to the alpha- -signal in TMEs. With the anti-alpha+ antibody used at 1/50 dilution, binding occurred at cell borders of both cell types, but only to SCEs when used at a >/=1/200 dilution in vitro and in vivo. SCEs were more resistive than TMEs (HC = 0.66 vs. 1.32 microl.min-1.mmHg-1.cm-2; P < 0.001) when perfused from apex to base. When perfused in the other direction, SCEs were again more resistive (5.23 vs. 9.04 microl.min-1.mmHg-1.cm-2; P < 0.01). GV formation occurred only in SCEs as a function of flow direction, perfusion pressure, and time. We conclude that SCEs and TMEs have distinctive phenotypic properties involving their content of ZO-1 isoforms, barrier function, and GV formation.
The purpose of this study was to compare human endothelial cells from Schlemm's canal (SCEs) and the trabecular meshwork (TMEs) in terms of ZO-1 isoform expression, hydraulic conductivity (HC) properties, and "giant" vacuole (GV) formation. The principal study methods were Western blot, RT-PCR, immunofluorescence, and perfusion chambers. Blot signals for alpha+ - and alpha- -isoforms were similar in SCEs but less intense for the alpha+ -relative to the alpha- -signal in TMEs. With the anti-alpha+ antibody used at 1/50 dilution, binding occurred at cell borders of both cell types, but only to SCEs when used at a >/=1/200 dilution in vitro and in vivo. SCEs were more resistive than TMEs (HC = 0.66 vs. 1.32 microl.min-1.mmHg-1.cm-2; P < 0.001) when perfused from apex to base. When perfused in the other direction, SCEs were again more resistive (5.23 vs. 9.04 microl.min-1.mmHg-1.cm-2; P < 0.01). GV formation occurred only in SCEs as a function of flow direction, perfusion pressure, and time. We conclude that SCEs and TMEs have distinctive phenotypic properties involving their content of ZO-1 isoforms, barrier function, and GV formation.
Related Concept Videos
Capillaries and Their Types
Structure of Blood Vessels
Overview of the Vascular System
Tight Junctions
Renal Corpuscle
Glomerulus: Structure and Function
The glomerulus is a tiny, intricate network of capillaries located at the beginning of the nephron. It's enveloped by the Bowman's capsule and receives its blood supply from an afferent arteriole, which divides into numerous capillaries...
Regulation of Angiogenesis and Blood Supply

