Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 17, 2026

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Cancer Drug Sensitization In Vitro and In Vivo
Published on: February 6, 2015
Apoptosis genes and resistance to cancer therapy: what does the experimental and clinical data tell us?
J Martin Brown1, George Wilson
1Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, California, USA. mbrown@stanford.edu
Abstract:
The dominant paradigm in cancer treatment is that cancer cells die from the common pathway of apoptosis subsequent to DNA damage by anticancer agents and that cells resistant to apoptosis are resistant to therapy. In this review we trace the logic that brought about this view and discuss whether the clinical and experimental data that have now accumulated over the past decade support the position. We show that there is support for the apoptosis model only for certain malignancies of hematopoietic origin. For the majority of cancers (which are of epithelial origin), even though some may exhibit apoptosis after treatment, there is little or no support for the concept that apoptosis, and the genes that govern it, determine the response to therapy. In general, whether apoptosis matters for overall tumor response depends on how soon after treatment apoptosis occurs. If it occurs early (within 4 to 6 hours after treatment), it is likely to be important for determining the overall response of the cell or tumor. This is the case for some tumors of myeloid and lymphoid origin. On the other hand, if apoptosis occurs long after exposure, 24-48 hrs, and usually after mitosis, then it is unlikely to be the determinant of cytotoxicity, and modifying it is unlikely to affect overall cell killing. This is the situation for most, if not all, tumors of epithelial or mesenchymal origin. What then causes cancer cells to die following treatment with anticancer agents? The evidence from ionizing radiation is clear: DNA damage leading to chromosome breaks. We argue that the situation is similar for most anticancer drugs. Indeed inability to repair the DNA damage produced by these agents, and the levels of the proteins involved in these repair processes, may explain the treatment sensitivity of some cancers. Further clinical studies in this area are needed.
Insights
Cancer cells typically die via apoptosis, but this review finds it
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Molecular Biology
- Cancer Therapeutics
Background:
- The dominant cancer treatment paradigm assumes apoptosis (programmed cell death) is the primary cell death pathway following DNA damage from anticancer agents.
- Resistance to apoptosis is widely considered equivalent to resistance to therapy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critically evaluate the prevailing apoptosis-centric model of cancer treatment response.
- To determine if accumulated clinical and experimental data support the apoptosis model for diverse cancer types.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing clinical and experimental data from the past decade.
- Analysis of the timing of apoptosis post-treatment and its correlation with overall tumor response.
- Examination of alternative cell death mechanisms, particularly DNA damage response pathways.
Main Results:
- The apoptosis model is supported for certain hematologic malignancies (e.g., myeloid and lymphoid cancers) where apoptosis occurs early (4-6 hours post-treatment).
- For most epithelial and mesenchymal cancers, apoptosis occurs late (24-48 hours post-treatment), often after mitosis, and is unlikely to determine treatment response.
- DNA damage and the capacity to repair it appear to be the primary drivers of cell death in most cancers, explaining treatment sensitivity.
Conclusions:
- The role of apoptosis in determining cancer treatment outcomes is context-dependent, primarily relevant for early apoptotic responses in hematologic cancers.
- For most solid tumors, DNA damage and repair capacity are more critical determinants of therapeutic response than apoptosis.
- Future clinical studies should focus on DNA damage and repair mechanisms to better understand and improve cancer treatment sensitivity.
More Related Videos
08:59Looking for Driver Pathways of Acquired Resistance to Targeted Therapy: Drug Resistant Subclone Generation and Sensitivity Restoring by Gene Knock-down
Published on: December 11, 2017
11:21Flow Cytometric Detection of Newly-formed Breast Cancer Stem Cell-like Cells After Apoptosis Reversal
Published on: January 26, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Cancer-Critical Genes II: Tumor Suppressor Genes
When the function of certain critical genes, especially those involved in cell cycle regulation and cell growth signaling cascades, gets disrupted, it upsets the cell cycle progression. Such cells with unchecked cell cycles start proliferating uncontrollably and eventually develop into tumors.
Such genes that act...
Apoptosis
The Extrinsic Apoptotic Pathway
The Intrinsic Apoptotic Pathway
Cancer-Critical Genes II: Tumor Suppressor Genes
When the function of certain critical genes, especially those involved in cell cycle regulation and cell growth signaling cascades, gets disrupted, it upsets the cell cycle progression. Such cells with unchecked cell cycles start proliferating uncontrollably and eventually develop into tumors.
Such genes that act...