Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 30, 2026

In Vitro and In Vivo Assessment of T, B and Myeloid Cells Suppressive Activity and Humoral Responses from Transplant Recipients
Published on: August 12, 2017
The balance of deletion and regulation in allograft tolerance
Xin Xiao Zheng1, Alberto Sanchez-Fueyo, Christoph Domenig
1Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Although the precise mechanisms involved in the establishment and maintenance of peripheral allograft tolerance are still not fully understood, it is now clear that acquisition of transplantation tolerance is an active, highly regulated, multistep process. According to the pool size model of allograft tolerance, the allograft outcome, rejection, or tolerance, often depends on the balance between cytopathic and regulatory T cells (Tregs). Although both deletion and regulation play important roles in allograft tolerance, our recent studies showed that the quantitative details for each mechanism differ from model to model. Therefore, we hypothesize that there is a delicate balance between deletion and regulation in allograft tolerance. In a model of allograft tolerance in which the deletional mechanism plays a dominant role, e.g. tolerance produced via creation of mixed chimeras, the regulatory mechanism, albeit sometimes present, is far less important. Whilst in a model in which the regulation mechanism plays a critical role, e.g. donor-specific transfusion plus MR1-induced allograft tolerance, a deletional mechanism lowers the threshold for effective Treg action.
Although the precise mechanisms involved in the establishment and maintenance of peripheral allograft tolerance are still not fully understood, it is now clear that acquisition of transplantation tolerance is an active, highly regulated, multistep process. According to the pool size model of allograft tolerance, the allograft outcome, rejection, or tolerance, often depends on the balance between cytopathic and regulatory T cells (Tregs). Although both deletion and regulation play important roles in allograft tolerance, our recent studies showed that the quantitative details for each mechanism differ from model to model. Therefore, we hypothesize that there is a delicate balance between deletion and regulation in allograft tolerance. In a model of allograft tolerance in which the deletional mechanism plays a dominant role, e.g. tolerance produced via creation of mixed chimeras, the regulatory mechanism, albeit sometimes present, is far less important. Whilst in a model in which the regulation mechanism plays a critical role, e.g. donor-specific transfusion plus MR1-induced allograft tolerance, a deletional mechanism lowers the threshold for effective Treg action.

