Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Priority setting in mental health services.

Gavin Mooney1

  • 1Social and Public Health Economics Research Group (SPHERe), Centre for International Health, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA, Australia. g.mooney@curtin.edu.au

Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
|November 19, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Some Management Information Issues in Indigenous Health.

Health information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia·2018
Same author

Information and Case Mix Funding.

Health information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia·2018
Same author

Health Information Management in the Australian Health Care System as a Whole.

Health information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia·2018
Same author

Implementing priority setting frameworks: Insights from leading researchers.

Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands)·2016
Same author

Africanizing the social determinants of health: embedded structural inequalities and current health outcomes in sub-Saharan Africa.

International journal of health services : planning, administration, evaluation·2014
Same author

Why are we failing on health equity and how can we do better in future?

Australian and New Zealand journal of public health·2012
Same journal

The Price of National Pharmaceutical Pricing in the EU: A Proposal for "Common Procurement".

Applied health economics and health policy·2026
Same journal

The Price of Speed: Estimating the Impact of List Prices on Time to Availability of New Medicines in 18 European Countries.

Applied health economics and health policy·2026
Same journal

Deprescribing Interventions in Older Adults with Polypharmacy: A Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations.

Applied health economics and health policy·2026
Same journal

Causal Impact of Primary Care and Publicly Funded Health Insurance on Catastrophic Health Spending From Climate-Sensitive Diseases in India.

Applied health economics and health policy·2026
Same journal

Health Economic Evaluations of Breast Cancer Screening Strategies: A Systematic Review Focusing on Methodology and Quality Assessment.

Applied health economics and health policy·2026
Same journal

Societal Preferences for Assessment Pathways of Rare Disease Drugs: A Discrete Choice Experiment.

Applied health economics and health policy·2026
See all related articles

This study proposes programme budgeting and marginal analysis (PBMA) for mental health service priority setting. It emphasizes incorporating equity and community values to improve resource allocation for the mentally ill.

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Mental Health Policy
  • Resource Allocation

Background:

  • Mental health services have historically received inadequate resources.
  • Effective priority setting is crucial for optimizing mental health service delivery.
  • There is a need to integrate equity and societal values into mental health resource allocation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present an approach for priority setting in mental health services using programme budgeting and marginal analysis (PBMA).
  • To explore the integration of vertical equity to address historical resource imbalances in mental health care.
  • To highlight the importance of community values and ethical considerations in mental health service planning.

Main Methods:

  • Application of programme budgeting and marginal analysis (PBMA) framework.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of vertical equity principles for resource redistribution.
  • Emphasis on eliciting community values and societal principles for mental health services.

    • Main Results:

    • PBMA offers a structured approach to mental health priority setting.
    • Vertical equity can help redress past underfunding of mental health services.
    • Incorporating community values is essential for defining the goals of mental health services.

    Conclusions:

    • A systematic approach using PBMA, equity, and community values can improve mental health service priority setting.
    • Careful consideration of value judgments and avoiding over-reliance on perfect evidence are crucial.
    • Operationalizing these principles can simplify mental health service planning.