Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Addressing risk preferences in cost-effectiveness analyses.

Joshua Graff Zivin1, John F Bridges

  • 1Department of Health Policy and Management, Mailman School of Public Health, International Center for Health Outcomes and Innovation Research, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.

Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
|November 19, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Social development of girls with a physical disability during adolescence: Parent perspectives.

Rehabilitation psychology·2025
Same author

Unit costs of needle and syringe program provision: a global systematic review and cost extrapolation.

AIDS (London, England)·2023
Same author

Temperature and work: Time allocated to work under varying climate and labor market conditions.

PloS one·2021
Same author

Using Crowd-Sourced Data to Assess the Temporal and Spatial Relationship between Indoor and Outdoor Particulate Matter.

Environmental science & technology·2021
Same author

The spread of COVID-19 shows the importance of policy coordination.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2020
Same author

Analysis of Educational Debt and Income Among Pharmacists and Other Health Professionals.

American journal of pharmaceutical education·2019
Same journal

The Price of National Pharmaceutical Pricing in the EU: A Proposal for "Common Procurement".

Applied health economics and health policy·2026
Same journal

The Price of Speed: Estimating the Impact of List Prices on Time to Availability of New Medicines in 18 European Countries.

Applied health economics and health policy·2026
Same journal

Deprescribing Interventions in Older Adults with Polypharmacy: A Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations.

Applied health economics and health policy·2026
Same journal

Causal Impact of Primary Care and Publicly Funded Health Insurance on Catastrophic Health Spending From Climate-Sensitive Diseases in India.

Applied health economics and health policy·2026
Same journal

Health Economic Evaluations of Breast Cancer Screening Strategies: A Systematic Review Focusing on Methodology and Quality Assessment.

Applied health economics and health policy·2026
Same journal

Societal Preferences for Assessment Pathways of Rare Disease Drugs: A Discrete Choice Experiment.

Applied health economics and health policy·2026
See all related articles

Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) needs to better address uncertainty. Emerging methods incorporate statistical decision-making errors and economic theories of risk preference to improve patient welfare assessments.

Area of Science:

  • Health Economics
  • Decision Science

Background:

  • Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) is a common economic evaluation tool in healthcare.
  • Despite its popularity, CEA often inadequately addresses uncertainty in health outcomes.
  • Two main approaches to uncertainty in CEA are emerging in health economics literature.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the limitations of current cost-effectiveness analyses in handling uncertainty.
  • To introduce two distinct schools of thought for addressing uncertainty in CEA.
  • To emphasize the importance of accounting for risk preferences in CEA for patient welfare.

Main Methods:

  • Review of health economics literature on cost-effectiveness analysis and uncertainty.
  • Identification and comparison of statistical and economic approaches to uncertainty.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of the implications of risk preferences for patient welfare in CEA.

    • Main Results:

    • Current CEAs frequently fail to adequately measure and account for uncertainty.
    • One approach focuses on the statistical probability of decision-making errors.
    • A second approach utilizes economic theories of risk preference to assess patient welfare implications.

    Conclusions:

    • Cost-effectiveness analyses must incorporate risk preferences to accurately reflect patient welfare.
    • Addressing uncertainty through risk preferences offers a more comprehensive economic evaluation.
    • Future CEAs should integrate these economic theories for improved healthcare decision-making.