Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cell phone use and visual attention.

Chloe Golden1, Charles J Golden, Barry Schneider

  • 1Broward County Schools, USA.

Perceptual and Motor Skills
|November 19, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Development of a checklist for cognitive assessment requirements (CARE) based on a Delphi consensus study.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Does high scatter on the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition general ability index reduce validity in predicting Wechsler Memory Scale-Fourth Edition indexes?

Applied neuropsychology. Adult·2022
Same author

Relative subtest scatter on the WAIS-IV in a clinical sample referred for outpatient neuropsychological evaluation.

The Clinical neuropsychologist·2021
Same author

Frequency of occurrence of four- and five-factor WAIS-IV profiles.

Applied neuropsychology. Adult·2019
Same author

The Influence of Ralph Reitan on the Development of the Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery.

Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists·2015
Same author

Pattern of memory compromise in chronic geriatric schizophrenia, frontotemporal dementia and normal geriatric controls.

Acta neuropsychiatrica·2014
Same journal

Theoretical and Psychological Mechanisms of Perceptual-Motor Learning in AI Bots-Assisted Art Education.

Perceptual and motor skills·2026
Same journal

Development and Measurement Properties of a Custom-Built Punch Force Dynamometer Based on S-Type Load Cells.

Perceptual and motor skills·2026
Same journal

Do Elite Taekwondo Athletes Invest Time for Better Choices? Analysis of Anticipatory Behavior Through a Perception-Action Coupling Task.

Perceptual and motor skills·2026
Same journal

Multisensory Contributions in Joint Actions: A Scoping Review.

Perceptual and motor skills·2026
Same journal

Proprioceptive Impairment and Joint Position Exposure Time in Relation to Patient-Report Outcome With Chronic Ankle Instability.

Perceptual and motor skills·2026
Same journal

Static Tactical Diagrams and Imagination: Differential Effects on Novice and Expert Handball Players.

Perceptual and motor skills·2026
See all related articles

Cell phones and in-person conversations significantly impair visual attention skills. However, using a cell phone was not found to be more distracting than talking to someone in the same room.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Traffic Safety Research

Background:

  • Cell phone use while driving is a growing concern.
  • Previous research indicates cell phones can negatively impact driver attention.
  • Limited studies compare cell phone conversations to other in-car distractions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the impact of cell phone conversations versus in-person conversations on visual attention.
  • To assess the degree of distraction caused by cell phones in a driving-related context.
  • To evaluate the effects on cognitive tasks essential for driving.

Main Methods:

  • Adult drivers (n=45) were divided into three groups.
  • Participants completed the Connors Continuous Performance Test II.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Group 1: control (no distraction). Group 2: in-room conversation. Group 3: cell phone conversation.

    • Main Results:

    • Significant differences in performance were observed between the control and experimental groups.
    • Both cell phone and in-person conversation groups showed reduced visual attention compared to the control.
    • No statistically significant difference in distraction levels was found between cell phone and in-person conversations.

    Conclusions:

    • Cell phone use and concurrent conversations substantially impair visual attention.
    • Distraction from cell phone conversations is comparable to that of in-person conversations.
    • Findings highlight the risks of multitasking while driving, regardless of the conversation type.