Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Item recognition memory and the receiver operating characteristic.

Andrew Heathcote1

  • 1School of Behavioural Sciences, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition
|November 19, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Positive Bias in Value-Based Decision Making: Neurocognitive Associations with Resilience.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2026
Same author

An illustrative guide to expressing cognitive theories using evidence accumulation modelling.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same author

Joint Cognitive Models Reveal Sources of Robust Individual Differences in Conflict Processing.

Computational brain & behavior·2026
Same author

The diffusion model's drift rate parameter primarily reflects efficiency, rather than speed, of evidence accumulation.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same author

Bayesian hierarchical cognitive modeling with the EMC2 package.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same author

Comparing the reliability of individual differences for various measurement models in conflict tasks.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Memory loves company: Related object pairs benefit working memory.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Ranschburg unrepeated.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

It was the best of times, it was the worst of times: Evidence for switch cost beyond stimulus-response tasks.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Testing the predictions of a distinctiveness model of memory: The production effect in backward recall.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

On the impact of adjacency on transposed-word effects under serial presentation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

It's time to opt out: Metacognitive analysis of time regulation under uncertainty.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
See all related articles

This study on memory recognition found that signal-detection models better explain data than dual-process models. Findings challenge existing theories on how study factors influence memory recall accuracy.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human Memory

Background:

  • Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis is crucial for understanding memory recognition.
  • Dual-process models and signal-detection models offer competing explanations for memory performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how study time, repetition, similarity, and category length affect item recognition memory ROCs.
  • To evaluate the validity of dual-process and signal-detection models in explaining these effects.

Main Methods:

  • Conducted four experiments manipulating study variables.
  • Analyzed item recognition memory data using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.
  • Applied signal-detection theory and dual-process models for data interpretation.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analyses rejected A. P. Yonelinas's dual-process model.
  • A normal unequal variance signal-detection model better fit the observed data.
  • Increased similarity, category length, and study repetition elevated the z-transformed ROC slope.
  • Massed study time did not significantly affect the ROC slope.

Conclusions:

  • The findings support signal-detection models over dual-process models for explaining recognition memory.
  • The results challenge R. Ratcliff, G. McKoon, and M. Tindall's "constancy-of-slopes" generalization.
  • Memory performance is influenced by item characteristics and study repetition, but not massed study time.