Nursing practice and the definition of human death

This paper aims to highlight the gap in nursing literature of discussion of the definition of human death--to show that nurses should engage in such discussion. For the nursing role in the care of brain dead patients and their relatives may unwittingly promote and foster a definition of human death which is fundamentally flawed. A person can be warm, pink, have an independently beating heart and be breathing, yet still be diagnosed as brainstem dead. Nursing literature which discusses issues surrounding brain death (as opposed to brain death itself), proposes that nurses should suppress any reservations which they may have in accepting that a patient with the characteristics described is dead; and that they should try to allay any reservations which relatives of such dead patients might have. But what if the concept of brainstem death is flawed? Surely, as accountable professionals, nurses should not accept the role just referred to without satisfying themselves that the concept of brainstem death is coherent and robust. This paper tries to show that, on examination, this is not the case. The definition of human death which guides practice in the UK and elsewhere is fundamentally flawed. Instead of suppressing their own intuitions, and the intuitions of patients' relatives in the management of patients diagnosed as brainstem dead, nurses should critically examine the definition of death which currently informs clinical practice. Our conclusion is that this definition is false.