Related Experiment Videos
Threshold quantity criteria for risk management programs: recommendations for toxic releases
Stuart Batterman1, Erika Kovacs
1Department of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, 2534 SPH-1, 109 Observatory Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2029, USA. stuartb@umich.edu
Journal of Hazardous Materials
|November 19, 2003
Summary
Current hazardous substance thresholds may not protect public health, as they are inconsistent and may exclude high-risk facilities. Revisions based on hazard zones are recommended for better safety.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Science
- Chemical Engineering
- Public Health
Background:
- Facilities using hazardous substances must comply with risk management programs to prevent chemical accidents.
- Current regulations in the EU and US use chemical-specific weight thresholds for toxic substances to determine compliance.
- These 'threshold quantities' aim to ensure facilities manage risks and protect public health.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the consistency and public health protectiveness of current 'threshold quantities' for hazardous substances.
- To assess the adequacy of existing regulations in identifying facilities that pose significant off-site risks.
Main Methods:
- Calculated chemical footprint/hazard zone length using current US threshold quantities and 'level of concern' (LOC) concentrations for 77 toxic chemicals.
- Utilized the Risk Management Program (RMP)*Comp model for worst-case scenario analysis.
- Calculated alternative distance-based weight thresholds using an atmospheric dispersion model with various meteorological and land-use scenarios.
Main Results:
- RMP*Comp yielded inconsistent results, with hazard zone lengths up to 40 km.
- Distance-based thresholds were significantly smaller than current listings, showing low correlation (r=0.34) and large discrepancies (up to three orders of magnitude).
- Alternative scenarios further reduced distance-based thresholds, increasing discrepancies and highlighting potential underestimation of risks.
Conclusions:
- Current threshold quantities may exclude facilities posing significant off-site risks and are inconsistent with off-site consequence analysis.
- Recommendations include revising threshold quantities, improving RMP*Comp, and establishing thresholds based on hazard zones or credible scenarios.
- Using consistent health-based LOC in screening and analysis is crucial for effective risk management.