Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Selection strategies for linkage studies using twins.

Hein Putter1, Jeremie Lebrec, Hans C van Houwelingen

  • 1Department of Medical Statistics, Leiden University Medical Center, University of Leiden, Leiden, The Netherlands. h.putter@lumc.nl

Twin Research : the Official Journal of the International Society for Twin Studies
|November 20, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effective sample size: A measure of individual uncertainty in predictions.

Statistics in medicine·2024
Same author

Analysis of survival outcomes in haematopoietic cell transplant studies: Pitfalls and solutions.

Bone marrow transplantation·2022
Same author

Multiple imputation for cause-specific Cox models: Assessing methods for estimation and prediction.

Statistical methods in medical research·2022
Same author

Validation of prediction models in the presence of competing risks: a guide through modern methods.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2022
Same author

Conventional regression analysis and machine learning in prediction of anastomotic leakage and pulmonary complications after esophagogastric cancer surgery.

Journal of surgical oncology·2022
Same author

Prediction Models for Celiac Disease Development in Children From High-Risk Families: Data From the PreventCD Cohort.

Gastroenterology·2022

Selective sampling of sibling pairs significantly enhances genetic linkage analysis for complex diseases. This method is more efficient than random sampling, reducing the required sample size for identifying quantitative trait loci (QTLs).

Area of Science:

  • Genetics
  • Biostatistics
  • Complex Disease Research

Background:

  • Genetic linkage analysis for complex diseases is challenging due to multiple small-effect genetic loci.
  • Large sample sizes are typically required for random sampling in twin registries, making it inefficient.
  • Selective sampling based on trait values can improve genotyping efficiency.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To derive simple expressions for the information gained from sibling pairs in linkage detection for quantitative trait loci (QTLs).
  • To compare the efficiency of random versus selective sampling strategies.
  • To extend findings to dichotomous traits using a liability threshold model.

Main Methods:

  • Derivation of analytical expressions for the information content of sibling pairs.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Consideration of both random and trait-selected sibling pair samples.
  • Extension of quantitative trait results to dichotomous traits via the liability threshold model.

    • Main Results:

    • Developed computationally rapid expressions for sibling pair information, avoiding simulation.
    • Demonstrated that selective sampling is more efficient than random sampling for linkage detection.
    • Provided sample size tables for height, insulin levels, and migraine.

    Conclusions:

    • Selective sampling strategies offer a more efficient approach to genetic linkage analysis for complex diseases.
    • The derived expressions facilitate rapid assessment of study designs and sample size requirements.
    • The findings are applicable to both quantitative and dichotomous traits.