Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Laparoscopic appendectomy: why it should be done.

Ferdinando Agresta1, Paolo De Simone, Ivan Michelet

  • 1Department of General Surgery, Presidio Ospedaliero di Vittorio Veneto, Vittorio Veneto, TV, Italy. fagresta@libero.it

JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
|November 25, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Correction: Manifesto of the collaborative alliance for research and educationin surgery: the CARES network. "Surgical research must become amilestone of progress in patient care in Italy".

Updates in surgery·2026
Same author

Colonic resection or self-expanding metal stents for obstructive left colon cancer: results of a national multicenter prospective cohort study (CROSCO-1).

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same author

The risk of neoplasms in appendiceal abscess: what emergency surgeons should know.

Frontiers in oncology·2026
Same author

Manifesto of the collaborative alliance for research and educationin surgery: the CARES network. "Surgical research must become amilestone of progress in patient care in Italy".

Updates in surgery·2026
Same author

Man made vitreous fibres: legislative and analytical background review.

Waste management (New York, N.Y.)·2025
Same author

Functional recovery of islet β cells in human type 2 diabetes: Transcriptome signatures unveil therapeutic approaches.

Science advances·2025
Same journal

Assessing Perioperative Risk According to Surgical Route in Hysterectomy for Very Large Uteri.

JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons·2026
Same journal

Thoracoscopic Intrathoracic Double-Flap Technique for EGJC.

JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons·2026
Same journal

Surgical Treatment Experience of Intestinal Endometriosis.

JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons·2026
Same journal

Office Hysteroscopy: Treating Intrauterine Pathology and Avoiding the Operating Room.

JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons·2026
Same journal

Totally Extramucosal Hand-Sewn Robotic Gastrojejunostomy for Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass.

JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons·2026
Same journal

Elements Affecting Quality of Life in Individuals With Gastroesophagel Reflux Disease.

JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons·2026
See all related articles

Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is as safe and effective as open surgery, with fewer complications and faster recovery. LA offers higher diagnostic accuracy, aiding in identifying concurrent diseases during surgery.

Area of Science:

  • Surgical Innovation
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Gastrointestinal Surgery

Background:

  • Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is widely perceived as advantageous but lacks universal acceptance.
  • A retrospective case-control study was conducted to compare LA with conventional open appendectomy.
  • The study aimed to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and outcomes of both surgical approaches.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To retrospectively compare the outcomes of laparoscopic appendectomy versus open appendectomy.
  • To assess complication rates, recovery times, and diagnostic accuracy between the two methods.
  • To determine if laparoscopic appendectomy is a viable alternative to open surgery.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective case-control study involving 555 patients undergoing appendectomy between January 1993 and November 2000.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Patients were divided into two groups: 322 underwent laparoscopic appendectomy and 233 underwent conventional open appendectomy.
  • Data collected included intraoperative and postoperative complications, recovery parameters, and diagnostic findings.

    • Main Results:

    • Laparoscopic appendectomy showed a significantly lower rate of minor postoperative complications, primarily wound infections (0.6% vs. 6.5%, P=0.001).
    • Laparoscopic appendectomy patients experienced faster flatus passage and shorter hospitalization periods.
    • Laparoscopy demonstrated higher diagnostic accuracy for concurrent diseases (12% vs. 1.5% for appendicitis patients, P<0.01; 57.3% vs. 8.8% for non-appendicitis patients, P<0.01).

    Conclusions:

    • Laparoscopic appendectomy is as safe and effective as conventional open surgery.
    • Laparoscopic appendectomy offers advantages including higher diagnostic yield, less trauma, and quicker postoperative recovery.
    • Laparoscopy presents a valuable alternative to laparotomy, particularly for premenopausal women undergoing urgent abdominal or pelvic surgery.