[Cefepime/amikacin in the empirical antibacterial therapy for patients with hemoblastosis of different forms]

T V Chudanova1, K M Abdulkadyrov, V N Chebotkevich

  • 1Russian Research Institute of Hematology and Transfusiology, Ministry of Public Health of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg.

Insights

Cefepime combined with amikacin showed higher efficacy (95%) than ceftriaxone with amikacin (60%) in treating severe infections in hemoblastosis patients with neutropenia.

Area of Science:

  • Hematology
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Patients with hemoblastosis undergoing chemotherapy often experience severe infections due to prolonged neutropenia.
  • High-risk patients with neutrophil counts below 100 cells/microliter are particularly susceptible to infectious complications.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficacy of cefepime plus amikacin versus ceftriaxone plus amikacin in treating severe infections in hemoblastosis patients.
  • To evaluate treatment outcomes in a high-risk neutropenic patient population.

Main Methods:

  • A comparative study involving 80 patients with various forms of hemoblastosis and severe infectious complications.
  • Patients were randomized to receive either cefepime and amikacin or ceftriaxone and amikacin.
  • Treatment duration and success rates were recorded for both groups.

Main Results:

  • The cefepime + amikacin group achieved a success rate of 95% (38/40 patients) over an average of 13 days.
  • The ceftriaxone + amikacin group had a success rate of 60% (24/40 patients) over an average of 14 days.
  • Both treatment regimens were administered to patients experiencing neutropenia for an average of 12 days.

Conclusions:

  • Cefepime in combination with amikacin is a more effective treatment for severe infections in hemoblastosis patients with neutropenia compared to ceftriaxone plus amikacin.
  • This combination therapy offers a higher success rate, potentially improving outcomes for high-risk cancer patients.