Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 19, 2026

Multiplex Therapeutic Drug Monitoring by Isotope-dilution HPLC-MS/MS of Antibiotics in Critical Illnesses
Published on: August 30, 2018
[Cefepime/amikacin in the empirical antibacterial therapy for patients with hemoblastosis of different forms]
T V Chudanova1, K M Abdulkadyrov, V N Chebotkevich
1Russian Research Institute of Hematology and Transfusiology, Ministry of Public Health of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg.
Abstract:
The results of the use of cefepime (Maxipime) combination with amikacin vs ceftriaxon combination with amikacin in the treatment of 80 patients with different forms of hemoblastosis are presented. Severe infectious complications in the patients were associated with prolonged and deep neutropenia during inductive or antirelapsing chemotherapy. All the patients in the trial were from the group of high risk of infectious complications with the blood neutrophil count under 100 cells/microliter. The duration of neutropenia averaged 12 days (7 to 15). The average period of the treatment with cefepime and amikacin equaled to 13 days (8 to 16). The treatment with cefepime + amikacin was successful in 38 out of 40 patients (95%). The average period of the treatment with ceftriaxon and amikacin equaled to 14 days (7 to 18). The efficacy of the treatment with ceftriaxon + amikacin was 60% (24 patients out of 40).
Insights
Cefepime combined with amikacin showed higher efficacy (95%) than ceftriaxone with amikacin (60%) in treating severe infections in hemoblastosis patients with neutropenia.
Area of Science:
- Hematology
- Infectious Diseases
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Patients with hemoblastosis undergoing chemotherapy often experience severe infections due to prolonged neutropenia.
- High-risk patients with neutrophil counts below 100 cells/microliter are particularly susceptible to infectious complications.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of cefepime plus amikacin versus ceftriaxone plus amikacin in treating severe infections in hemoblastosis patients.
- To evaluate treatment outcomes in a high-risk neutropenic patient population.
Main Methods:
- A comparative study involving 80 patients with various forms of hemoblastosis and severe infectious complications.
- Patients were randomized to receive either cefepime and amikacin or ceftriaxone and amikacin.
- Treatment duration and success rates were recorded for both groups.
Main Results:
- The cefepime + amikacin group achieved a success rate of 95% (38/40 patients) over an average of 13 days.
- The ceftriaxone + amikacin group had a success rate of 60% (24/40 patients) over an average of 14 days.
- Both treatment regimens were administered to patients experiencing neutropenia for an average of 12 days.
Conclusions:
- Cefepime in combination with amikacin is a more effective treatment for severe infections in hemoblastosis patients with neutropenia compared to ceftriaxone plus amikacin.
- This combination therapy offers a higher success rate, potentially improving outcomes for high-risk cancer patients.
More Related Videos
09:26Antibiotic Efficacy Testing in an Ex vivo Model of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms in the Cystic Fibrosis Lung
Published on: January 22, 2021
11:15Quadruple-Checkerboard: A Modification of the Three-Dimensional Checkerboard for Studying Drug Combinations
Published on: July 24, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Stability-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management