Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 30, 2026
Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses
Published on: January 23, 2017
Universal newborn hearing screening: fine-tuning the process
1Division of Audiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Ohio 45229, USA. Kelly.Baroch@cchmc.org
Insights
Universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) is effective and cost-efficient. Improving follow-up compliance and multidisciplinary team support are key for optimal outcomes in hearing-impaired infants.
Area of Science:
- Audiology
- Pediatrics
- Public Health
Background:
- Universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) is becoming standard practice.
- Healthy People 2010 aims for screening by 1 month, evaluation by 3 months, and intervention by 6 months.
Purpose of the Study:
- Review trends and protocols for UNHS.
- Identify areas for improving UNHS programs.
- Provide data for states implementing screening.
Main Methods:
- Review of recent studies and program data.
- Analysis of screening effectiveness and outcomes.
- Identification of challenges and best practices.
Main Results:
- UNHS programs are cost-effective with low referral rates.
- Screening does not necessarily increase maternal stress.
- Developmental outcomes are encouraging for screened infants.
Conclusions:
- UNHS is the crucial first step for hearing-impaired infants.
- Ensuring follow-up compliance without causing stress is vital.
- Seamless transition to early intervention requires a multidisciplinary team for comprehensive infant and family support.
Purpose Of Review:
Universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) is rapidly becoming the standard of care in hospitals across the country. The goals of Healthy People 2010 are to provide newborn hearing screening to all infants, ensure follow-up audiologic evaluations by 3 months of age, and provide smooth transition to early intervention by 6 months of age. Programs implemented in the 1990s are beginning to report data that will be useful to states new to screening. This article reviews recent trends, suggests appropriate screening protocols, and identifies areas for improvement in UNHS.
Recent Findings:
Recent studies indicate the following: (1) screening programs can be cost-effective with low referral rates; (2) maternal stress is not necessarily a byproduct of screenings that end in referral; and (3) developmental outcomes for hearing-impaired infants born in screening hospitals are particularly encouraging. Areas for improvement include the following: (1) compliance in follow-up testing and (2) the establishment of a cohesive multidisciplinary team to manage the infant and provide support to the family.
Summary:
Hearing screening is only the first step in the care of a hearing-impaired infant. Programs need to ensure that families understand the necessity of follow-up testing without creating undue stress. The transition to early intervention should be seamless, with a cohesive team of health care professionals capable of providing medical, audiologic, communication, and educational management for the infant as well as emotional support for the family.
