Spectroscopic QSAR methods and self-organizing molecular field analysis for relating molecular structure and...

The performance of three "spectroscopic" quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) methods (eigenvalue (EVA), electronic eigenvalue (EEVA), and comparative spectra analysis (CoSA)) for relating molecular structure and estrogenic activity are critically evaluated. The methods were tested with respect to the relative binding affinities (RBA) of a diverse set of 36 estrogens previously examined in detail by the comparative molecular field analysis method. The CoSA method with (13)C chemical shifts appears to provide a predictive QSAR model for this data set. EEVA (i.e., molecular orbital energy in this context) is a borderline case, whereas the performances of EVA (i.e., vibrational normal mode) and CoSA with (1)H shifts are substandard and only semiquantitative. The CoSA method with (13)C chemical shifts provides an alternative and supplement to conventional 3D QSAR methods for rationalizing and predicting the estrogenic activity of molecules. If CoSA is to be applied to large data sets, however, it is desirable that the chemical shifts are available from common databases or, alternatively, that they can be estimated with sufficient accuracy using fast prediction schemes. Calculations of NMR chemical shifts by quantum mechanical methods, as in this case study, seem to be too time-consuming at this moment, but the situation is changing rapidly. An inherent shortcoming common to all spectroscopic QSAR methods is that they cannot take the chirality of molecules into account, at least as formulated at present. Moreover, the symmetry of molecules may cause additional problems. There are three pairs of enantiomers and nine symmetric (C(2) or C(2)(v)) molecules present in the data set, so that the predictive ability of full 3D QSAR methods is expected to be better than that of spectroscopic methods. This is demonstrated with SOMFA (self-organizing molecular field analysis). In general, the use of external test sets with randomized data is encouraged as a validation tool in QSAR studies.