Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Asynchronous perception of motion and luminance change.

Dirk Kerzel1

  • 1FB 06, Psychologie und Sportwissenschaft, Abteilung Allgemeine Psychologie, Otto-Behaghel-Str. 10F, 35394 Giessen, Germany. dirk.kerzel@psychol.uni-giessen.de

Psychological Research
|November 25, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Temporal acceleration drives the probability cueing effect in visual search: Evidence for early attentional deployment (N1pc) at high-probability locations.

Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior·2026
Same author

A multilab investigation into the N2pc as an indicator of attentional selectivity: Direct replication of Eimer (1996).

Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior·2025
Same author

Guidance of attention by irrelevant contents of working memory is transient.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2025
Same author

Electrophysiological evidence for the optimal tuning of attention.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Persistent effects of salience in visual working memory: Limits of cue-driven guidance.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2025
Same author

Priming of pop-out in the spatial-cueing paradigm.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2024

Perception of motion occurs before conscious awareness of luminance changes. This visual processing difference, observed in motion perception studies, impacts how we perceive visual events.

Area of Science:

  • Visual perception
  • Cognitive neuroscience
  • Psychophysics

Background:

  • The perception of visual motion and luminance changes involves complex neural processing.
  • Understanding the temporal dynamics of these processes is crucial for explaining visual illusions like the flash-lag effect.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the temporal order in which motion and luminance changes are consciously perceived.
  • To determine if motion is processed faster than luminance changes and quantify the latency difference.

Main Methods:

  • Observers tracked a target on a circular path and indicated the moment of luminance change.
  • Judged positions of luminance change were compared to actual positions to infer temporal processing differences.
  • Control experiments assessed auditory localization and motion onset judgments to rule out general forward bias.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The perceived position of luminance change was displaced in the direction of motion, indicating a processing delay.
  • Motion was processed significantly faster than luminance change.
  • This latency difference was more pronounced for smaller luminance decrements.

Conclusions:

  • First-order motion is perceived before a precise representation of luminance is available in conscious awareness.
  • These findings support existing models of the flash-lag effect and highlight distinct processing speeds for motion and luminance.
  • The results are not attributable to a general forward displacement tendency in perception.