Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 30, 2026

Vascularized Composite Upper Limb Allograft Harvesting for Proximal Arm Allotransplantation
Published on: June 13, 2025
A comparison of a triple-injection axillary brachial plexus block with the humeral approach
Xavier March1, Berta Pardina, Sílvia Torres-Bahí
1Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital Universitari de Girona Dr. Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain. anestesia@htrueta.scs.es
Background And Objectives:
This prospective, randomized, and single-blind study compared effectiveness, performance, onset, and total anesthetic time and complications of the multiple axillary block (median, radial, and musculocutaneous nerves) with the humeral approach.
Methods:
One hundred patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups. In group A (axillary) median, radial, and musculocutaneus nerves were located by a nerve stimulator and injections were made. In group H (humeral) all 4 terminal nerves of the brachial plexus were located and injections were made. A total of 40 mL mepivacaine of 1% was used.
Results:
Complete sensory block of all 6 peripheral nerves occurred in 94% and 79% of patients in groups A and H, respectively (P < .05). The time to perform the block was shorter in group A (8 +/- 4 minutes v 11 +/- 4 minutes; P < .001); onset time was shorter in group A (16 +/- 8 minutes v 21 +/- 9 minutes; P < .05); total anesthetic time was shorter in group A (24 +/- 8 minutes v 33 +/- 10 minutes; P < .0001). Complete motor block was greater in group A (88% v 66%; P < .05). More vascular punctures occurred in group A (22% v 8%, P < .05).
Conclusion:
The triple-injection axillary block was more effective than the humeral approach as it was associated with more cases of sensory and complete motor block and gave shorter performance and onset times.
Related Concept Videos
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Intravenous Regional Anesthesia
One of the advantages of...
Arteries of the Upper Limbs
