Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Infection control of lung function equipment: a practical approach.

A H Kendrick1, D P Johns, J P Leeming

  • 1Department of Respiratory Medicine, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol BS2 8HW, UK. adrian.kendrick@ubht.swest.nhs.uk

Respiratory Medicine
|November 26, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Molecular approaches for the diagnosis and epidemiological investigation of Aspergillus infection.

Mycoses·2017
Same author

Atopy in people aged 40 years and over: Relation to airflow limitation.

Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology·2017
Same author

Cardiovascular effects of methacholine-induced airway obstruction in man.

Journal of physiology and pharmacology : an official journal of the Polish Physiological Society·2014
Same author

Clinical relevance of a positive molecular test in the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.

The Journal of hospital infection·2013
Same author

Poor lung function and tonsillectomy in childhood are associated with mortality from age 18 to 44.

Respiratory medicine·2010
Same author

Adherence to asthma management guidelines by middle-aged adults with current asthma.

Thorax·2009
Same journal

Adults with Congenital Lung Malformations: A Descriptive Analysis of an Underexplored Population.

Respiratory medicine·2026
Same journal

Risk Factors and Microbiological Characteristics of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in a Tunisian Intensive Care Unit During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Respiratory medicine·2026
Same journal

Impact of Therapeutic Hypothermia on Oxygen Demand and Respiratory Function in Post-Cardiac Arrest Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Respiratory medicine·2026
Same journal

The longitudinal decrease in exercise tolerance and disease progression in mild-to-moderate COPD.

Respiratory medicine·2026
Same journal

The implications of adopting the race-neutral spirometry equations in the detection of airway obstruction in Chilean children with asthma.

Respiratory medicine·2026
Same journal

Long-term outcomes of home mechanical ventilation in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy - an observational study.

Respiratory medicine·2026
See all related articles

The risk of patient cross-infection from lung function testing equipment is low. Routine cleaning and disinfection are sufficient for most patients, with extra precautions for infectious or immunocompromised individuals.

Area of Science:

  • Pulmonary Medicine
  • Infection Control
  • Medical Equipment Safety

Background:

  • Quantifying the risk of cross-infection via lung function testing equipment is crucial.
  • Current evidence suggests elaborate precautions are often unnecessary for most patients.
  • Routine cleaning and disinfection protocols are essential for equipment safety.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the existing evidence on cross-infection risks associated with lung function testing equipment.
  • To provide practical recommendations for managing infection control in pulmonary function laboratories.
  • To assess the necessity of additional precautions for specific patient groups.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of studies on cross-infection and lung function testing equipment.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of disinfection and sterilization methods for respiratory equipment.
  • Evaluation of factors influencing patient susceptibility and infectivity.

    • Main Results:

    • The degree of cross-infection risk from lung function equipment is not fully quantified.
    • Routine cleaning and disinfection are generally adequate; elaborate precautions are not widely justified.
    • Chemical disinfection methods require careful application.
    • Additional precautions like barrier filters may be needed for infectious or immunocompromised patients, but routine use is not cost-effective based on current evidence.

    Conclusions:

    • While the exact risk is unquantified, current evidence supports routine cleaning and disinfection for lung function equipment.
    • Specific patient factors (infectious or immunocompromised status) warrant tailored precautions.
    • Further research is needed to precisely quantify cross-infection risks, guiding future recommendations.