Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

An easily removable ceramic bracket?

N A Fox1, J F McCabe

  • 1Department of Child Dental Health, Newcastle Dental School, Newcastle Upon Tyne.

British Journal of Orthodontics
|November 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Corrigendum to "Frontal alpha asymmetry moderates the relations between behavioral inhibition and social-effect ERN" [Biological Psychology (2019) 10-16].

Biological psychology·2021
Same author

Early-childhood social reticence predicts SCR-BOLD coupling during fear extinction recall in preadolescent youth.

Developmental cognitive neuroscience·2019
Same author

Frontal alpha asymmetry moderates the relations between behavioral inhibition and social-effect ERN.

Biological psychology·2019
Same author

Time-frequency approaches to investigating changes in feedback processing during childhood and adolescence.

Psychophysiology·2018
Same author

Disruptions of working memory and inhibition mediate the association between exposure to institutionalization and symptoms of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Psychological medicine·2015
Same author

Frequency and topography in monkey electroencephalogram during action observation: possible neural correlates of the mirror neuron system.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2014
Same journal

The bedfordshire PDS orthodontic pilot.

British journal of orthodontics·1999
Same journal

Reviews and abstracts

British journal of orthodontics·1999
Same journal

Re: Forestadent travel award.

British journal of orthodontics·1999
Same journal

Re: Orthologic 'A' company award for 1997.

British journal of orthodontics·1999
Same journal

Digital cameras.

British journal of orthodontics·1999
Same journal

Cortical bone screws for maxillomandibular fixation in orthognathic surgery.

British journal of orthodontics·1999
See all related articles

New ceramic brackets (Ceramaflex) with polycarbonate bases offer easier debonding but may lead to more bracket failures during orthodontic treatment. Further research is needed to confirm their clinical reliability compared to traditional metal brackets.

Area of Science:

  • Orthodontics
  • Biomaterials Science
  • Dental Materials

Background:

  • Ceramic brackets in orthodontics can cause enamel damage and patient trauma during debonding.
  • A new ceramic bracket, Ceramaflex, features a polycarbonate laminated base, claiming simplified debonding.
  • Independent data validating the Ceramaflex bracket's debonding claims are currently lacking.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the in-vitro bond strength of Ceramaflex ceramic brackets to enamel.
  • To compare the bond strength and debonding characteristics of Ceramaflex brackets with standard metal Edgewise brackets.
  • To assess the incidence of enamel damage and bracket integrity during debonding.

Main Methods:

  • In-vitro testing of bond strength to enamel.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparison between Ceramaflex ceramic brackets and metal Edgewise brackets.
  • Assessment of enamel damage and bracket integrity post-debonding.

    • Main Results:

    • The bond strength of Ceramaflex brackets was comparable to metal brackets but less reliable.
    • No bracket fracture or enamel damage occurred during debonding of Ceramaflex brackets.
    • Debonding of Ceramaflex brackets was facile, suggesting potential for increased in-treatment debonding events.

    Conclusions:

    • Ceramaflex ceramic brackets facilitate easier debonding without causing enamel damage.
    • The bond reliability of Ceramaflex brackets may be lower than traditional metal brackets.
    • Increased instances of bracket debonding during orthodontic treatment are a potential concern with Ceramaflex brackets.