Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Binocular rivalry in split-brain observers.

Robert P O'Shea1, Paul M Corballis

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand. r_oshea@otago.ac.nz

Journal of Vision
|December 4, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Acoustic Features of Emotional Vocalizations Account for Early Modulations of Event-Related Brain Potentials.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same author

When perception meets grief: how the brain reconstructs person networks in response to absence.

Social cognitive and affective neuroscience·2025
Same author

Linking the Behavioral and Neural Correlates of Cognitive Control: Evidence From the Eriksen Flanker Task.

Psychophysiology·2025
Same author

A multilab investigation into the N2pc as an indicator of attentional selectivity: Direct replication of Eimer (1996).

Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior·2025
Same author

Attention is required for canonical brain signature of prediction error despite early encoding of the stimuli.

PLoS biology·2023
Same author

All-or-none neural mechanisms underlying face categorization: evidence from the N170.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2022
Same journal

Analysis of human visual experience data.

Journal of vision·2026
Same journal

Pyramid-based Bayesian modeling for high-resolution behavioral analysis.

Journal of vision·2026
Same journal

Sensation without perception: The white whale effect and perceptual blindness in autonomous vehicles.

Journal of vision·2026
Same journal

Gaze behavior during closed-captioned movie viewing adapts to absent audio through more frequent switching between text and scene.

Journal of vision·2026
Same journal

In pursuit of saccade awareness: Limited volitional control and minimal conscious access to catch-up saccades during smooth pursuit eye movements.

Journal of vision·2026
Same journal

Dissociable effects of element-lifetime and stimulus-duration on local and global motion processing: An equivalent noise study.

Journal of vision·2026
See all related articles

Binocular rivalry, where perception alternates between eyes, was studied in split-brain patients. Findings suggest rivalry arises from low-level processes within each hemisphere, not interhemispheric switching.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Science
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • Binocular rivalry involves alternating visual perception between stimuli presented to each eye.
  • Two main theories explain rivalry: interhemispheric switching or a right frontoparietal cortex mechanism.
  • Split-brain patients, with severed corpus callosum, offer a unique model to test these theories.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the neural basis of binocular rivalry in split-brain observers.
  • To differentiate between interhemispheric switching and localized cortical mechanisms for rivalry.

Main Methods:

  • Studied binocular rivalry in split-brain observers presenting stimuli to one or both hemispheres.
  • Compared rivalry phenomena when stimuli were directed to the left hemisphere versus the right hemisphere.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Binocular rivalry occurred similarly regardless of whether stimuli were presented to the left or right hemisphere.
  • The observed rivalry patterns contradicted the theory of interhemispheric switching as the primary mechanism.

Conclusions:

  • Binocular rivalry is likely mediated by low-level neural processes within each cerebral hemisphere.
  • The findings challenge theories positing higher-level, interhemispheric control over rivalry perception.