Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 30, 2026

A Multicenter MRI Protocol for the Evaluation and Quantification of Deep Vein Thrombosis
Published on: June 2, 2015
Perianal infections: reader agreement and diagnostic performance of fat-suppressed contrast-enhanced MRI
Ayşe Erden1, Ethem Geçim, Suat Fitoz
1Department of Radiology, Ankara University, Medical School, Ankara, Turkey. ayse.erden@medicine.ankara.edu.tr
Abstract:
We aimed to determine the diagnostic performance of the contrast-enhanced fat-suppression technique in the detectability of perianal infections and to compare this technique with different MR sequences used for this purpose. Thirty consecutive patients with clinically suspected anorectal infections were examined with fast spin-echo (FSE) T2-weighted, short-inversion-time inversion recovery (STIR), and fat-suppressed and non-fat-suppressed T1-weighted spoiled gradient-echo (SGE) (in-phase) dynamic contrast-enhanced sequences. The results of MRI were correlated with the findings of surgery, which was considered as the standard of reference. Receiver-operating-characteristic curves were reconstructed to describe and compare the diagnostic value of each MR technique. The values of kappa were used as a measure of observer reliability. Diagnostic performances of STIR, FSE T2-weighted and fat-suppressed and non-fat-suppressed, contrast-enhanced SGE T1-weighted techniques showed statistically insignificant differences in detection of perianal infections. There was almost perfect interobserver agreement regarding the presence of lesions on each MR technique. Fat-suppressed, contrast-enhanced SGE T1-weighted MRI showed adequate diagnostic performance in the detection of perianal infections. However, its significance is not different from the other MR sequences used for the present study.
Insights
Contrast-enhanced fat-suppression MRI techniques show comparable diagnostic performance for perianal infections. No single magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequence significantly outperformed others in detecting these infections.
Area of Science:
- Radiology
- Medical Imaging
- Gastroenterology
Background:
- Perianal infections require accurate diagnostic imaging.
- Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is utilized for evaluating anorectal conditions.
- Optimizing MRI sequences for infection detection is crucial for patient management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced fat-suppression MRI for perianal infections.
- To compare this technique against other standard MRI sequences.
- To evaluate the detectability of perianal infections using various MRI protocols.
Main Methods:
- Thirty patients with suspected anorectal infections underwent MRI.
- Sequences included fast spin-echo (FSE) T2-weighted, short-inversion-time inversion recovery (STIR), and fat-suppressed/non-fat-suppressed T1-weighted spoiled gradient-echo (SGE) dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
- MRI findings were correlated with surgical outcomes (gold standard); receiver-operating-characteristic curves and kappa values were used for analysis.
Main Results:
- No statistically significant differences in diagnostic performance were observed among STIR, FSE T2-weighted, and contrast-enhanced SGE T1-weighted (fat-suppressed and non-fat-suppressed) techniques for perianal infection detection.
- Fat-suppressed, contrast-enhanced SGE T1-weighted MRI demonstrated adequate diagnostic performance.
- High interobserver agreement was noted for lesion detection across all evaluated MRI techniques.
Conclusions:
- Contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed MRI is adequate for detecting perianal infections.
- Its diagnostic significance is comparable to other MRI sequences evaluated in this study.
- The choice of MRI sequence may not critically impact the detection of perianal infections.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI
Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Radiological Investigation I: X-ray and CT
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography