Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 30, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
Published on: September 16, 2022
Correlations between parameters in risk models: estimation and propagation of uncertainty by Markov Chain Monte Carlo
1MRC Health Services Research Collaboration, Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristo, Canynge Hall, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Abstract:
Monte Carlo simulation has become the accepted method for propagating parameter uncertainty through risk models. It is widely appreciated, however, that correlations between input variables must be taken into account if models are to deliver correct assessments of uncertainty in risk. Various two-stage methods have been proposed that first estimate a correlation structure and then generate Monte Carlo simulations, which incorporate this structure while leaving marginal distributions of parameters unchanged. Here we propose a one-stage alternative, in which the correlation structure is estimated from the data directly by Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods. Samples from the posterior distribution of the outputs then correctly reflect the correlation between parameters, given the data and the model. Besides its computational simplicity, this approach utilizes the available evidence from a wide variety of structures, including incomplete data and correlated and uncorrelated repeat observations. The major advantage of a Bayesian approach is that, rather than assuming the correlation structure is fixed and known, it captures the joint uncertainty induced by the data in all parameters, including variances and covariances, and correctly propagates this through the decision or risk model. These features are illustrated with examples on emissions of dioxin congeners from solid waste incinerators.
Related Concept Videos
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals
Uncertainty: Overview
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
