Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Robotic surgery: urologic implications.

Michael E Moran1

  • 1Capital District Urologic Surgeons, Albany, New York 12208, USA. memoran2@juno.com

Journal of Endourology
|December 4, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

HF01-01 The "Exhibition of Living Patients"-Hutchinson, Ethics and Urology: Erratum.

The Journal of urology·2025
Same author

The Wales Endoscope: The First American Cystoscope.

Urology·2022
Same author

Evolution of robotic arms.

Journal of robotic surgery·2014
Same author

Hidden in plain sight: the history of marketing and urology.

Urology·2012
Same author

Marketing and medicine: a questionable mix.

The Journal of medical practice management : MPM·2012
Same author

Sir William Osler's speech at Troy: a Trojan horse?

Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center)·2012
Same journal

Is Nonpapillary Puncture a Feasible Alternative to Papillary Access in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Journal of endourology·2026
Same journal

Procedure, Safety, and Outcomes of Patient-Controlled Sedation in Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: A 7-Year Cohort Study.

Journal of endourology·2026
Same journal

Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Patients Undergoing Holmium Laser Enucleation of Prostate for Benign Hyperplasia: A Preoperative Nomogram and a Postoperative Surveillance Protocol.

Journal of endourology·2026
Same journal

Bubble Trouble: The Thermal Risk of Ureteral Laser Lithotripsy in an Air Bubble.

Journal of endourology·2026
Same journal

Development of an Interpretable Machine Learning Model for Predicting Clavien-Dindo Grade ≥2 Complications after Unilateral Minimally Invasive Pyeloplasty in UPJO: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Journal of endourology·2026
Same journal

Comparison of Appendiceal Onlay Ureteroplasty and Appendiceal Interposition Ureteroplasty for Complex Proximal Ureteral Strictures in Children: Insights Gained from Long-Term Follow-Up.

Journal of endourology·2026
See all related articles

This review examines robotic surgical systems, focusing on their use as a second assistant for camera control and stability in laparoscopic surgery. It details the theory, benefits, drawbacks, and clinical applications of various mechanical and robotic arms.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Robotics
  • Surgical Technology
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery

Background:

  • Current medical robots are sophisticated manipulators, not anthropomorphic beings.
  • Robots are defined as automatically controlled, freely programmable multitask manipulators.
  • Robotic systems offer precision, endurance, and speed, enhancing surgical procedures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the theory, advantages, disadvantages, and clinical use of robotic arm systems.
  • To evaluate systems designed to assist the second surgeon and stabilize cameras in laparoscopic surgery.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature and clinical data on robotic surgical systems.
  • Analysis of mechanical and robotic arm systems, including specific named devices.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparison of systems based on their function as a camera holder and assistant.

    • Main Results:

    • Identified key robotic systems like da Vinci, ZEUS, AESOP, Robotrac, and First Assistant.
    • Included mechanical-assist systems such as Omnitract, Iron Intern, Bookwalter, Surgassistant, Trocar Sleeve Stabilizer, and Endoholder.
    • Highlighted the role of these systems in improving camera direction and stability during laparoscopic procedures.

    Conclusions:

    • Robotic and mechanical arm systems are valuable tools in laparoscopic surgery.
    • These systems can effectively replace a human second assistant, enhancing surgical performance.
    • Further clinical utilization and understanding of robotic systems are crucial for advancing surgical techniques.