Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Reliability of functional localization using fMRI.

Khena M Swallow1, Todd S Braver, Abraham Z Snyder

  • 1Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130-1125, USA.

Neuroimage
|December 4, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Multiple event segmentation mechanisms in the human brain.

eLife·2026
Same author

Brain activity is not only for thinking.

Current opinion in behavioral sciences·2026
Same author

Brain resting state functional connectivity changes with aerobic exercise, and mindfulness: A narrative review.

Sports medicine and health science·2026
Same author

Task-evoked deactivations: dissociation between BOLD fMRI and FDG.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Elevated functional magnetic resonance imaging activity in cognitively normal participants predicts future dementia.

Brain communications·2026
Same author

Age Differences in Hippocampal Neural Timescales During Movie-Viewing.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Functional localization in neuroimaging is most reliable when performed individually using data in atlas space. Combining participant data negatively impacts the reliability of identifying brain regions like the MT complex and frontal eye fields.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroimaging
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Brain Mapping

Background:

  • Functional brain region localization is crucial for neuroimaging research.
  • Reliability of defining regions of interest (ROIs) impacts study outcomes.
  • Two common operations affecting ROI reliability are spatial normalization and group data aggregation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the impact of spatial normalization and group analysis on the reliability of functionally defined brain regions.
  • To compare the reliability of individual versus group-based functional localization.
  • To determine optimal methods for reliable functional localization in neuroimaging.

Main Methods:

  • Assessed the reliability of functionally identified MT complex and frontal eye fields.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examined the effects of spatial normalization to a stereotactic atlas.
  • Investigated the impact of statistically combining data across participants.

    • Main Results:

    • Spatial normalization showed minimal effect on within-subject reliability.
    • Group analysis significantly reduced the reliability of region activation and location retest measures.
    • Individual functional localization in atlas space demonstrated higher reliability.

    Conclusions:

    • Individual functional localization using data in atlas space is the most reliable method.
    • Group analysis compromises the reliability of functionally defined regions for typical sample sizes.
    • Researchers should prioritize individual-based functional localization for robust neuroimaging findings.