Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Instruction-specific brain activations during episodic encoding. a generalized level of processing effect.

Karl Magnus Petersson1, Johan Sandblom, Christina Elfgren

  • 1Cognitive Neurophysiology Research Group R2-01, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska Hospital, S-171 76 Stockholm, Sweden. karl.magnus.peterson@fcdonders.kun.nl

Neuroimage
|December 4, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reply to Fitzgerald et al.: Mischaracterizing our findings; the cognitive profile of elite footballers remains robust.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Brain aging in bipolar disorder using a neuroimaging and machine learning-derived metric: Findings from the ENIGMA BD Working Group.

Journal of affective disorders·2026
Same author

Reply to Musculus et al.: A case of offside in scientific discourse?

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

How to Refine and Prioritize Key Performance Indicators for Digital Health Interventions: Tutorial on Using Consensus Methodology to Enable Meaningful Evaluation of Novel Digital Health Interventions.

Journal of medical Internet research·2025
Same author

Decoding the elite soccer player's psychological profile.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

Delusion-proneness predicts COVID-19 vaccination behavior.

Frontiers in psychiatry·2024
Same journal

Investigating the Neural Origins of Ear-EEG: A Correlation Study Using Scalp EEG Source Reconstruction.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Hysteresis effects in visual and auditory perception and the comparison of underlying neural mechanisms - an EEG study.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Short-term audio-tactile training affects cortical auditory speech-envelope tracking for incongruent but not congruent stimuli.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Dissociable Neurocognitive Mechanisms of State and Trait Anxiety in Working Memory: Threat-Induced Alterations in Decision Dynamics and Attenuation of Large-Scale Network Reconfiguration.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Neuro-Ocular Amyloid Characterization in Alzheimer's Disease via Cross-Site PET-MRI and Hierarchical Cross-Attention Driven Multimodal Representation Learning.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Whole-brain network dynamics underlying intolerance of uncertainty.

NeuroImage·2026
See all related articles

The levels-of-processing (LOP) effect in visual memory is influenced by both stimulus relevance and explicit instructions. Deep processing (pleasantness) engages left-brain regions, while shallow processing (visual quality) activates right-brain areas.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Neuroimaging
  • Psychology

Background:

  • The levels-of-processing (LOP) framework posits that deeper semantic encoding leads to better memory recall than shallow, perceptual encoding.
  • Previous research has explored LOP effects primarily with verbal material, with less focus on visual stimuli and their neural correlates.
  • Understanding the neural basis of LOP is crucial for elucidating memory formation and retrieval mechanisms.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the levels-of-processing (LOP) effect using visual stimuli (line drawings) in a combined behavioral and Positron Emission Tomography (PET) study.
  • To examine how encoding instructions (pleasantness vs. graphical quality) and material type (figurative vs. nonfigurative) influence behavioral recognition performance.
  • To map the brain activation patterns associated with deep (semantic) and shallow (perceptual) visual encoding.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

  • A within-subject design was employed, combining behavioral measures of recognition memory with functional neuroimaging (PET) during encoding.
  • Participants judged visual stimuli (line drawings) based on either pleasantness (deep encoding) or graphical quality (shallow encoding).
  • PET scans recorded brain activity during these encoding tasks to identify regional cerebral blood flow changes.

Main Results:

  • Behavioral data revealed independent contributions of encoding instruction and material type to recognition performance, suggesting both encoding opportunity and mode are important.
  • PET results showed distinct patterns of brain activation: deep encoding (pleasantness) was associated with left-lateralized frontoparietal and anterior temporal activations.
  • Shallow encoding (graphical quality) elicited right-lateralized frontoparietal, posterior temporal, and occipitotemporal activations, challenging the HERA model of hemispheric asymmetry.

Conclusions:

  • The LOP effect in visual memory arises from both the inherent relevance of stimuli and the specific encoding strategy induced by instructions.
  • Distinct neural networks support deep (left-hemisphere dominant) and shallow (right-hemisphere dominant) visual encoding, diverging from predictions of the HERA model.
  • Specific brain regions, including the anterior medial superior frontal cortex (self-referential processing), anterior cingulate/medial orbitofrontal cortex (affective processing), and medial temporal lobe (meaning-based processing), are implicated in different aspects of visual encoding.