Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

The downside of categories.

Gregory L Murphy¹

¹Department of Psychology, New York University, 6 Washington Place, New York, NY 10003, USA. gregory.murphy@nyu.edu

Trends in Cognitive Sciences

|December 3, 2003

Summary

People make different inferences about new objects based on the initial category level (general vs. specific). This highlights how category-based induction has limitations, even without new object information.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Word meaning in minds and machines.

Psychological review·2021

Same author

People's sensitivity to content vs. formal properties of visual stimuli: Evidence from category construction.

Acta psychologica·2019

Same author

On Fodor's First Law of the Nonexistence of Cognitive Science.

Cognitive science·2019

Same author

Contrasting Semantic versus Inhibitory Processing in the Angular Gyrus: An fMRI Study.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2018

Same author

Does practice in category learning increase rule use or exemplar use-or both?

Memory & cognition·2018

Same author

Do salient features overshadow learning of other features in category learning?

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition·2017

Area of Science:

Cognitive Science
Psychology
Decision Making

Background:

Category membership is crucial for inferring properties of novel objects.
Understanding how categorization level influences these inferences is key to cognitive research.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate how the level of categorization (general vs. specific) affects inductive reasoning about novel objects.
To examine the impact of categorization hierarchy on inference generation.

Main Methods:

Participants were presented with novel objects and categorized them at either a general or specific level.
Inferences about the object were then assessed without providing additional information.
A between-subjects design was employed to compare the two categorization conditions.

Main Results:

Inferences drawn about novel objects differed significantly based on whether initial categorization was general or specific.
The level of categorization influenced subsequent judgments, even when no new object data was introduced.
This demonstrates a context effect within category-based induction.

Conclusions:

The findings reveal inherent limitations in category-based induction, showing that the process is sensitive to the initial level of categorization.
This suggests that the structure of the categorization process itself, not just the category assigned, plays a significant role in human inference.
Further research is needed to explore the cognitive mechanisms underlying this phenomenon.

Related Experiment Videos