Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Errors in general practice: development of an error classification and pilot study of a method for detecting errors.

G Rubin1, A George, D J Chinn

  • 1Centre for Primary and Community Care, University of Sunderland, Sunderland, UK. greg.rubin@sunderland.ac.uk

Quality & Safety in Health Care
|December 4, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Gender-affirming care in South Africa: A cross-sectional survey of transgender and gender-diverse people in the Eastern and Western Cape provinces, South Africa.

South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde·2026
Same author

Parenteral artesunate compliance and hospital outcomes in children under five with suspected severe malaria in Sierra Leone.

Public health action·2026
Same author

SIGNIFIED: whole-body MRI screening in Li-Fraumeni syndrome in the UK.

ESMO open·2026
Same author

Extension of the intravitreal injection interval after switching to faricimab in patients with exudative AMD: The multicenter FAR WEST study.

Journal francais d'ophtalmologie·2026
Same author

Li Fraumeni syndrome in the UK: clinical characteristics and outcomes of TP53 carriers.

ESMO open·2025
Same author

Embedding systems thinking in local authority public health practice: a case study.

Perspectives in public health·2025
Same journal

Organisational culture: variation across hospitals and connection to patient safety climate.

Quality & safety in health care·2010
Same journal

The Rhode Island ICU collaborative: a model for reducing central line-associated bloodstream infection and ventilator-associated pneumonia statewide.

Quality & safety in health care·2010
Same journal

Assessing and improving safety culture throughout an academic medical centre: a prospective cohort study.

Quality & safety in health care·2010
Same journal

The WHO patient safety curriculum guide for medical schools.

Quality & safety in health care·2010
Same journal

Preventing ethics conflicts and improving healthcare quality through system redesign.

Quality & safety in health care·2010
Same journal

Improvement leaders: what do they and should they do? A summary of a review of research.

Quality & safety in health care·2010
See all related articles

A new classification system for errors in general practice was developed and found to be feasible. Most reported errors were administrative, highlighting the need for improved risk management processes in primary care.

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Quality and Safety
  • Primary Care Medicine
  • Risk Management in Healthcare

Background:

  • Patient safety is a critical concern in general practice.
  • Effective error reporting mechanisms are essential for identifying and mitigating risks.
  • Existing methods for error classification and reporting in primary care require refinement.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a comprehensive classification of errors encountered in general practice.
  • To assess the feasibility and acceptability of a novel method for staff-reported error collection.
  • To inform risk management strategies through understanding error patterns.

Main Methods:

  • An iterative process was employed to develop an error classification system.
  • An anonymous self-report form was designed and implemented for error data collection.

Related Experiment Videos

  • The acceptability of the reporting method was evaluated using self-completion questionnaires.

    • Main Results:

    • An initial error classification included six categories: prescriptions, communication, appointments, equipment, clinical care, and other.
    • Over a two-week period, 940 errors were recorded across ten general practices.
    • Prescription-related errors (42%) and communication errors (30%) were most frequent; medication errors constituted only 6% of prescription errors. The overall error rate was 75.6 per 1000 appointments.
    • The reporting method was acceptable to 68% of respondents.

    Conclusions:

    • A practical and acceptable method for reporting errors in general practice has been developed.
    • The developed error classification system can be integrated into risk management processes.
    • Errors are prevalent in general practice, with a majority being administrative rather than clinical, indicating potential areas for targeted interventions.