Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The measurement of active errors: methodological issues.

R J Lilford1, M A Mohammed, D Braunholtz

  • 1Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK. r.j.lipford@bham.ac.uk

Quality & Safety in Health Care
|December 4, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evaluation of spirometric lung function among healthcare professionals working in operating theatres: A comparative cross‑sectional study.

African journal of thoracic and critical care medicine·2025
Same author

Pilot study to test the feasibility and clinical efficacy of a psychosocial care programme for patients with psychosis in low-resource settings.

Asian journal of psychiatry·2024
Same author

Qualitative study to explore the perspectives and mental health experiences of first episode psychosis patients and their caregivers in North India.

Asian journal of psychiatry·2024
Same author

Protocol-based assessment and management of first episode psychosis: Comparison of short and medium-term outcomes in psychopathology, quality of life, functioning and family burden across two sites in India.

Asian journal of psychiatry·2024
Same author

Bayesian Estimation of Different Scale Parameters Using a LINEX Loss Function.

Computational intelligence and neuroscience·2022
Same author

Application of the LINEX Loss Function with a Fundamental Derivation of Liu Estimator.

Computational intelligence and neuroscience·2022
Same journal

Organisational culture: variation across hospitals and connection to patient safety climate.

Quality & safety in health care·2010
Same journal

The Rhode Island ICU collaborative: a model for reducing central line-associated bloodstream infection and ventilator-associated pneumonia statewide.

Quality & safety in health care·2010
Same journal

Assessing and improving safety culture throughout an academic medical centre: a prospective cohort study.

Quality & safety in health care·2010
Same journal

The WHO patient safety curriculum guide for medical schools.

Quality & safety in health care·2010
Same journal

Preventing ethics conflicts and improving healthcare quality through system redesign.

Quality & safety in health care·2010
Same journal

Improvement leaders: what do they and should they do? A summary of a review of research.

Quality & safety in health care·2010
See all related articles

Accurate measurement is crucial for valid patient safety research. Improving methods for measuring errors ensures research findings are meaningful, precise, and reliable for better patient care.

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Research
  • Patient Safety Science
  • Methodology and Measurement

Background:

  • The validity of research hinges on robust methodology.
  • Patient safety research highlights significant methodological challenges.
  • Ensuring the accuracy of error measurement is vital for meaningful research outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address critical issues in the measurement of error within patient safety research.
  • To emphasize the necessity of precise and accurate measurement techniques.
  • To advocate for further research into measurement methodologies.

Main Methods:

  • Review of methodological issues in patient safety research.
  • Discussion of the principles of meaningful, precise, and accurate measurement.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Identification of gaps in current error measurement techniques.

    • Main Results:

    • Patient safety research is significantly impacted by methodological limitations.
    • There is a critical need for improved methods to measure errors accurately.
    • Current measurement approaches may lack the required precision and accuracy for valid inferences.

    Conclusions:

    • Methodological rigor, particularly in error measurement, is paramount for valid patient safety research.
    • Further research is essential to develop and refine measurement techniques.
    • Enhanced measurement accuracy will improve the reliability of research findings and inform better management practices.