Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

How accurate is current TKR instrumentation?

S David Stulberg1

  • 1Northwest Orthopeadic Institute, Northwestern Memorial Hospital Joint Reconstruction and Implant Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, 60611, USA. jointsur@nwu.edu

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
|December 4, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Use of a Novel Surgical Irrigant Significantly Reduces Rate of Infection in Primary Hip and Knee Arthroplasty at 1 year.

Arthroplasty today·2025
Same author

Normative Values for Daily Functional Recovery Patterns Following Total Knee Arthroplasty.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2024
Same author

A Novel Irrigant to Eliminate Planktonic Bacteria and Eradicate Biofilm Superstructure With Persistent Effect During Total Hip Arthroplasty.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2022
Same author

Patient-Reported Outcomes After Total Hip Arthroplasty in a Low-Resource Country by a Visiting Surgical Team.

Arthroplasty today·2021
Same author

Caveat Emptor: Adverse Inflammatory Soft-Tissue Reactions in Total Hip Arthroplasty with Modular Femoral Neck Implants: A Report of Two Cases.

JBJS case connector·2017
Same author

Intra-Articular Vancomycin Powder Eliminates Methicillin-Resistant S. aureus in a Rat Model of a Contaminated Intra-Articular Implant.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume·2017
Same journal

Impact Microindentation Evaluates Bone Strength, Bone Quality, and Fracture Susceptibility Across Skeletal Sites: A Cadaver Study.

Clinical orthopaedics and related research·2026
Same journal

What Is the Effect of Robot Reduction in Displaced Pelvic Fractures? A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial.

Clinical orthopaedics and related research·2026
Same journal

CORR Insights®: Acute or Delayed TKA for Tibial Plateau Fracture? An Observational Study From the Swedish Arthroplasty Register.

Clinical orthopaedics and related research·2026
Same journal

Reply to the Letter to the Editor: Guest Editorial: Recalling a Recall.

Clinical orthopaedics and related research·2026
Same journal

Radial Head Fractures Cluster in the Anterolateral and Anteromedial Quadrants and Do Not Correlate With Coronoid Fracture Types.

Clinical orthopaedics and related research·2026
Same journal

Reduced Cerebellar Activation With Eyes Closed Is Associated With Delayed Peroneal Reaction Time in Patients With Chronic Ankle Instability.

Clinical orthopaedics and related research·2026
See all related articles

Mechanical total knee replacement (TKR) systems show limitations in accuracy. Computer-assisted navigation reveals inconsistencies in mechanical TKR procedures, highlighting areas for improved surgical precision.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Surgical Navigation Systems

Background:

  • Mechanical alignment systems are standard for total knee replacement (TKR).
  • These systems have inherent limitations affecting procedural accuracy.
  • Previous studies suggest variability in mechanical alignment outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the accuracy of conventional mechanical intramedullary instrumentation in TKR.
  • To compare the precision of mechanical systems with computer-assisted navigation.
  • To identify specific steps in TKR where mechanical instrumentation introduces errors.

Main Methods:

  • An image-free computer-assisted navigation system was employed.
  • Accuracy was assessed for a conventional mechanical intramedullary TKR system.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Measurements were taken for multiple steps within the TKR procedure for 20 cases.

    • Main Results:

    • Mechanical instrumentation achieved reasonable frontal and sagittal limb alignment (within 3 degrees).
    • Consistent errors were observed, including slight knee flexion, femoral component hyperextension, tibial posterior tilt, and femoral internal rotation.
    • Only 4 out of 20 TKRs met optimal accuracy (< 3 degrees) for all measured steps.

    Conclusions:

    • Current mechanical instrumentation for TKR does not consistently achieve optimal accuracy in all procedural steps.
    • Computer-assisted navigation offers superior accuracy (< 1 degree error) for measuring TKR steps.
    • Improving TKR accuracy through advanced navigation may enhance implant longevity, pain relief, and function.