Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Patenting nonassociated polymeric structures (NAPS): implications for structural genomic data release.

Lawrence M Sung1

  • 1University of Maryland School of Law, 500 West Baltimore Street, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. lsung@law.umaryland.edu

Journal of Structural and Functional Genomics
|December 3, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A second generation human haplotype map of over 3.1 million SNPs.

Nature·2007
Same author

Genome-wide detection and characterization of positive selection in human populations.

Nature·2007
Same journal

Protein sequence-similarity search acceleration using a heuristic algorithm with a sensitive matrix.

Journal of structural and functional genomics·2017
Same journal

Toward the next step in G protein-coupled receptor research: a knowledge-driven analysis for the next potential targets in drug discovery.

Journal of structural and functional genomics·2017
Same journal

Special issue: big data analyses in structural and functional genomics.

Journal of structural and functional genomics·2017
Same journal

Classification of ligand molecules in PDB with graph match-based structural superposition.

Journal of structural and functional genomics·2016
Same journal

VaProS: a database-integration approach for protein/genome information retrieval.

Journal of structural and functional genomics·2016
Same journal

NLDB: a database for 3D protein-ligand interactions in enzymatic reactions.

Journal of structural and functional genomics·2016
See all related articles

Patent law struggles to balance open access and exclusivity for genomic data. Discovering specific utility for nonassociated polymeric structures (NAPS) is crucial for patent protection, impacting data sharing.

Area of Science:

  • Biotechnology Law
  • Intellectual Property
  • Genomic Science

Background:

  • Intellectual property laws aim to balance open access and exclusivity in scientific research.
  • Genomic inventions and data sharing present complex challenges to existing patent frameworks.
  • The International Structural Genomics Organisation is involved in debates surrounding genomic data release and intellectual property.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze U.S. patentability standards for nonassociated polymeric structures (NAPS) and their structural data.
  • To assess the impact of utility requirements on patenting genomic discoveries.
  • To inform the public debate on balancing intellectual property rights with open access in structural genomics.

Main Methods:

  • Review of U.S. patent law standards, specifically the utility requirement.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of legal precedents and potential challenges in patent litigation for NAPS.
  • Examination of the implications for intellectual property protection of genomic data.

    • Main Results:

    • Obtaining patent rights for NAPS in the U.S. is challenging due to the "specific, substantial, and credible utility" requirement.
    • NAPS and related data may not meet patentability criteria without demonstrable biological significance.
    • The U.S. Patent & Trademark Office and federal courts may reject or invalidate NAPS claims based on lack of utility.

    Conclusions:

    • The difficulty in securing enforceable patent rights for NAPS could disincentivize delaying structural genomic data release.
    • Current U.S. patent law presents significant hurdles for protecting NAPS and associated data.
    • Reconciling intellectual property protection with the need for open access in genomics remains a critical issue.