Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 30, 2026

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
The psychology of compensatory and retributive justice
John M Darley1, Thane S Pittman
1Department of Psychology, Princeton University, NJ 08544, USA. jdarley@princeton.edu
Abstract:
How do observers respond when the actions of one individual inflict harm on another? The primary reaction to carelessly inflicted harm is to seek restitution; the offender is judged to owe compensation to the harmed individual. The primary reaction to harm inflicted intentionally is moral outrage producing a desire for retribution; the harm-doer must be punished. Reckless conduct, an intermediate case, provokes reactions that involve elements of both careless and intentional harm. The moral outrage felt by those who witness transgressions is a product of both cognitive interpretations of the event and emotional reactions to it. Theory about the exact nature of the emotional reactions is considered, along with suggestions for directions for future research.
Related Concept Videos
Compensation Mechanisms
Respiratory Compensation
This mechanism addresses metabolic-induced pH imbalances by adjusting breathing rates. Respiratory compensation begins within minutes of detecting a pH...
Equity Theory
Fundamental Attribution Error
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory
Motivational Bias
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory
